Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enex Technologies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:25, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Enex Technologies

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP, repeatedely declined at draft. Fail of WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:ORGIND, WP:SIRS. scope_creep^Talk 19:16, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Italy. Shellwood (talk) 19:21, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:NCORP. Madeleine (talk) 21:44, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear editors, I’ve revamped the article with solid reliable sources. Added independent coverage from *Corriere della Sera* (12 Mar 2024) and *Il Sole 24 Ore* (7 Oct 2023). Promotional wording removed; text now neutral and dated (“As of 22 May 2025”). Primary docs appear only to back data already analysed by those papers. All refs use `{{cite web}}` with access-date 22 May 2025; no bare URLs. Please review before any deletion—I’m happy to refine further. Happy to fix any remaining issues. Thanks a lot! Darnathiss (talk) 15:31, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not meet NCORP due to lack of in-depth, independent articles. Example of WP:REFBOMB as many of these sources are not about the company but refrigerants it uses that have existed for a while. Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 00:04, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Dear editors, I’ve revamped the article with solid reliable sources. Added independent coverage from *Corriere della Sera* (12 Mar 2024) and *Il Sole 24 Ore* (7 Oct 2023). Promotional wording removed; text now neutral and dated (“As of 22 May 2025”). Primary docs appear only to back data already analysed by those papers. All refs use `{{cite web}}` with access-date 22 May 2025; no bare URLs. Please review before any deletion—I’m happy to refine further. Happy to fix any remaining issues. Thanks a lot! Darnathiss (talk) 15:31, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.