Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dawn Pictures (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:10, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dawn Pictures

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no SIGCOV to satisfy WP:NCORP. A newly launched production company (2024) with two films and minimal press, the money laundering issue concerns the producer not the entity. EmilyR34 (talk) 06:09, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film, Companies, and Tamil Nadu. EmilyR34 (talk) 06:09, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and per the previous AfD. I see no coverage that provides any level of WP:CORPDEPTH about the company itself. The original version of this article was also blatantly AI-generated, with half of its citations being 404 errors. The creator replaced it with a new version that is less unambiguously G15-able, but I still doubt the sentence These reports are contemporary, independently published news items and are cited here as factual reporting of coverage could possibly have been written by a human. MCE89 (talk) 07:02, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify no change since last deletion. Only 1 of its 3 films have been released. DareshMohan (talk) 23:15, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify: A newly established company that is fast rising. Yet it is already producing tentpoles. Kailash29792 (talk) 00:35, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I don't really mind if the consensus is to draftify this, but given that it's already been deleted once draftifying it seems like a recipe for this to get moved straight back into mainspace and wind up straight back at AfD. I also don't think there's that much value in preserving the contents of an article that is almost certainly AI-generated. MCE89 (talk) 09:54, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.