Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ Mangoo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ansh 666 02:58, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DJ Mangoo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable DJ, Has only become known for one song (Eurodancer) and even then I wouldn't say notability's there, nothing on Google News, Fails MUSIC & GNG –Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 14:06, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 14:26, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 14:26, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 14:26, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 14:26, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 14:26, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not pass the notability guidelines for musicians.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:49, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Drive-by vote?--BabbaQ (talk) 13:06, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, A Train^talk 14:23, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Passes WP:GNG. article needs more references and a clean-up but that is not a reason for deletion. Clearly chart success. Articles on other Wikipedias also a clear notion of notability. Chart success.BabbaQ (talk) 13:06, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Released 4 songs .... 1 got to #55 on Swedishcharts.com .... I would hardly call that "chart success"!, "article needs more references" - Absolutely agree on that point however there is no sources, Them having articles on other projects is utterly irrelevant - Many socks who are blocked here go to other projects and create articles on themselves all of which are never deleted, Again 1 song at #55 on a non notable chart is hardly success, As a !keeper you need to prove how and why he's notable which so far you haven't done. –Davey2010^Talk 15:25, 7 January 2018 (UTC)(23:21, 13 January 2018 (UTC))[reply]
Delete. I have tried to find sources about him, including site:.se searches, and I have added one and corrected the link to swedishcharts.com. There is a tremendous amount of hits on his name, but it is hard to find something of substance and reliability. As such, I currently fail to see that we are near a pass of the basic notability guideline for people, and I find that having had one single peak at no. 55 is not a pass under the additional criteria for musicians. If anybody else can source him, ping me and I'll reconsider my position, but we need to be conservative with BLPs. The argument is made that Articles on other Wikipedias also a clear notion of notability, but no, WP:OTHERLANGS: "the existence of such articles does not indicate, by itself, that a topic is notable." It is rather more interesting that Swedish Wikipedia, that often is more lenient, deleted the article in 2016. Sam Sailor 10:00, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 17:56, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- does not meet WP:MUSICBIO and significant RS coverage not found. WP:TOOSOON per review of available sources. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:01, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - doesn't meet WP:GNG - significant coverage not found. PhilKnight (talk) 01:46, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.