Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DC Young Fly

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 01:58, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DC Young Fly

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

What makes this person pass WP:NBIO? No significant coverage in reliable, independent sources, some of those in the article are already rotten away. Seems like vanity entry for a YouTuber/celebrity wannabe. PS. Article creator has been indef blocked for vandalism... _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:07, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:31, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:31, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:31, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:31, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:32, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:32, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, fail GNG Emily Khine (talk) 19:53, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Clearly has not done anything of any significance. The article can be recreated if the situation changes, but it's a clear delete as it stands.Tuzapicabit (talk) 11:27, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.