Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cesare Toraldo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn‎ based on Beannie's new sourcing and there being no outstanding delete !votes. FOARP (talk) 10:55, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cesare Toraldo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Mass created article by Lugnuts. Fails WP:NSPORT due to the lack of any significant coverage in independent, reliable sources being cited in the article (or the corresponding IT WP article) or found in my WP:BEFORE search.

De'prodded by BeannieFan11 with the comment "being recipient of the highest honor for Italian sportspeople as well as a seven-time world championship medalist indicates notability". With all due respect to Beannie, none of this is a reason to keep this article within our PAGs. The Golden Collar is an award given out to roughly a hundred or more people each year, with coverage of it typically just being a listing of all the names (see, e.g., this 2017 report from the Italian Olympic Committee's website) so there's no reason to believe it would have generated significant coverage, particularly since Toraldo received it in 2019 and if it had generated such coverage, it would be available online.

As for being a "seven-time world championship medalist" this is only if you count team events. Toraldo does not inherent the notability of his team. FOARP (talk) 14:00, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

:Delete: My research shows him mentioned in passing, but nothing specifically about him that seems like it'd count as significant coverage--even if it didn't seem mostly routine. I didn't take a too-deep look into Italian-language sources, but I did try my best to make sure I wasn't overlooking anything obvious. They didn't seem to have anything of note to say either. ShyAndroid (talk) 00:27, 24 January 2025 (UTC) Keep, I think? I can't read the sources that have been introduced by @BeanieFan11:, so this isn't a super sure response, but I think that it seems like enough from a purely 'number of sources' perspective. I tried my best, but I'm glad someone looked a little harder than I did at Italian-language coverage. ShyAndroid (talk) 06:08, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.