Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Center for Inspired Teaching

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. It sounds like there has been improvement on the article that might address the nominator's concerns. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:06, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Center for Inspired Teaching

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Moved from AfC. I don't see WP:ORG level coverage here. Much of the sourcing is primary, churnalism and/or not in depth Star Mississippi 00:06, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Education, and Washington. Star Mississippi 00:06, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – this org has been in the news since 1996 (the news link above shows plenty of hits over the years) and won awards in 2022 and 2023. Sure, it could use work – I just fixed the latest refs which were very poorly done by someone who probably cares about the org but is not experienced with WP referencing. Let's improve it rather than remove it. Dicklyon (talk) 17:00, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:22, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:05, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Dicklyon's comments above and his work cleaning up the article. This is a "weak keep" for me - I think notability is still just over the line. --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 03:48, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Dicklyon. There's enough RS coverage here to pass the notability bar. Sal2100 (talk) 20:29, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.