Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Between Night and Day

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. ✗plicit 06:44, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Between Night and Day

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. I was unable to locate any WP:SIGCOV on this film. The few hit I did get in google books were all highly perfunctory and did not rise to level of coverage as described in WP:NFILM.4meter4 (talk) 06:18, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. 4meter4 (talk) 06:18, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. -Mushy Yank. 12:54, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: added things; seems notable enough; a redirect is absolutely warranted so needless to say I am very opposed to deletion. -Mushy Yank. 13:10, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Portugal and Spain. -Mushy Yank. 16:18, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This article has significantly changed since its AfD nomination. -Mushy Yank. 20:17, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: In addition to what has already been added, there seems to be some SIGCOV here, though I don't have access. Somebodyidkfkdt (talk) 13:36, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as the article has been significantly improved since nomination with the addition of content referenced to multiple reliable sources that together show a pass of WP:GNG so that deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 20:35, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.