Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Astra Tech
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 08:42, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Astra Tech (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Blatant advertisement. Only coverage is press releases/companies announcements. No secondary coverage. Probable COI. Fails WP:NCORP. Bakhtar40 (talk) 09:52, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Companies, Technology, and United Arab Emirates. Bakhtar40 (talk) 09:52, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment @Bakhtar40: if it's blatant advertisement, it would be eligible for CSD G11 Unambiguous advertising or promotion. Killarnee (talk) 10:05, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Killarnee, You might be right. Since it was already marked as afd. How can we move it to the G11 standards now? Bakhtar40 (talk) 13:10, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- AfD is superior to SD, so we should wait for the outcome of the AfD. I also did not mean that it is blatant advertising, but only what would be appropriate if it is so. Killarnee (talk) 10:56, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Killarnee, You might be right. Since it was already marked as afd. How can we move it to the G11 standards now? Bakhtar40 (talk) 13:10, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Benison (Beni · talk) 10:53, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delete When I saw the plethora of refs, I thought, "How could this subject not be notable?" But as the nom states, it's a collection of press releases (whoever wrote the article carefully left out the name of the sources, which a large proportion seem to come from "Gulf Business", which is just an outlet for press releases from the company, and confer no notability). The company has products, yes, but the sources don't discuss the parent company. So I agree that this topic is not notable. Angryapathy (talk) 15:58, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.