Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Applus+ IDIADA

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:26, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Applus+ IDIADA

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Salt evasion of Applus+. Reliant almost entirely on primary sources. No evidence of notability per WP:NORG * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 16:04, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Engineering, and Spain. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:56, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete None of the references meet GNG/NCORP criteria for establishing notability. Surprised nobody noticed this Salt evasion till now too. HighKing⁺⁺ 11:39, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.