Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anson Seabra

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:57, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Anson Seabra

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lots of hits on non-reliable and social media sites, can't find any in-depth references from independent, reliable sources, fails WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:25, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:25, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kansas-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:38, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - a Lack of significant coverage. Bearian (talk) 09:38, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete clearly fails notability and he has no significant coverage. Pizza on Pineapple ^{(Let's eat🍕)} 19:37, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: These for sources have SIGCOV and verify separate claims in the article ([1], [2], [3], [4], [5]). Hits (magazine) is reliable per WP:A/S, while the others seems legit, at least in comparison to other sources I found on the guy. LastJabberwocky (talk) 13:45, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Relatively close (given the sources provided by LastJabberwocky), but I would concur with the above editors that the subject falls short of widespread, significant coverage that might demonstrate notability. I would be willing to change my vote if there the original author provided more independent sec sources. GuardianH 00:28, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.