Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angus MacLane

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:08, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Angus MacLane

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage, more seems to be like a vanity article. Google search doesn't turn out anything significant. Ireneshih (talk) 05:00, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. The ChampionMan 1234 06:36, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. The ChampionMan 1234 06:36, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. The ChampionMan 1234 06:36, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. The ChampionMan 1234 06:36, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Keep Meets WP:ANYBIO and WP:NRVE. While not over-sourced, this article IS sourced and, now sourced within its current content, it seems this individual has won two Annie Awards.[1] That would seem to be something significant that could have been found through a little research. Notability is met. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 09:28, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And I agree that WP:GNG is now met as well. Nominator, there is no shame in a withdrawal... specially as your nomination contentions were so easily proven incorrect. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 15:54, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep meets WP:GNG LADY LOTUS • TALK 12:43, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Don't think he meets the GNG, but he meets WP:CREATIVE. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 15:31, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as meets WP:GNG –Davey2010 • (talk) 22:31, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.