User talk:Squawkconspicuity

Welcome!

Hello, Squawkconspicuity, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Electricmemory (talk) 02:24, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: FlightSimExpo (August 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CharlieMehta was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:FlightSimExpo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Charlie (talk) 05:50, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Squawkconspicuity! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Charlie (talk) 05:50, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Charlie! Curious if there was anything specific that made it fail npov? Not sure I can see that myself tbh Squawkconspicuity (talk) 08:48, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Terminal control area have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Terminal control area was changed by Squawkconspicuity (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.878139 on 2025-09-08T22:55:07+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:55, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Ivao altitude.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Ivao altitude.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under the non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:21, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ivao altitude.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ivao altitude.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:22, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Squawkconspicuity! The thread you created at the Teahouse, criteria for upgrade to class B, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:27, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Flight rules

I removed the PROD because that was supposed to be a disambiguation page but an IP changed it for no good reason. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (#1 deranged), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 15:07, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ah no worries, didn't catch that. Thank you! ✦ squawk conspicuity (talk) 15:07, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Airspace

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Airspace, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:53, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Move page

Hi, I recently noticed you moved highest unclimbed mountains to unclimbed mountains. Stuff like this should be discussed in WP:AFD beforehand. I have moved it back to the original page, but feel free to start a discussion. Thanks! Breck0530 (talk) 18:24, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I accidently linked to wrong thing. You should start discussion at Wikipedia:Requested moves#Requesting controversial and potentially controversial moves. Thanks! Breck0530 (talk) 18:27, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies! I figured it was fairly self explanatory given the content of the article so was following Wikipedia:Be bold ✦ squawk conspicuity (talk) 18:36, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Yea, but the article only talks about the highest unclimbed mountains, even the short description says it. Breck0530 (talk) 18:39, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]