Jump to content

User talk:Usernamekiran

Page contents not supported in other languages.
This user has AutoWikiBrowser permissions on the English Wikipedia.
This user uses Huggle to fight vandalism.
This user has new page reviewer rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user has page mover rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user has rollback rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user uses STiki to fight vandalism.
This user uses Twinkle to fight vandalism.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:KiranBOT)

WP:RETENTION: This editor is willing to lend a helping hand. Just ask.

Please comment on Talk:Useful idiot

[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Useful idiot. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Is that you DumbBOT?
usernamekiran(talk) 19:59, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

See Special:Diff/1283820024, in an attempt to remove the AMP url, it made the URL an unhelpful ambiguous URL.

Luckily, the URL wasn't really necessary before since it was syndicated from another source, which I replaced with the original source. I would not be surprised if a lot of yardbarker links did this, since they mostly syndicated then pull articles from other sources, but these become harder to find when they go from this amp url to a more ambiguous one. Might need a quick review to see if this happened anywhere else. If you have a list, I can go through and try and fix them with the original source. Chew(VTE) 22:29, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Chew: Hi. Yes, none of the yardbarker URLs were usable when I found the issue a few weeks ago. So I added the yardbarker domain to the ignore list, and removed all the problematic yardbarker URLs from the database. There were quite a few of them. Currently there are only seven yardbarker URLs in the database that were operational. I undid all the changes I could find, seems like I missed some. Unfortunately, I do not have a list (as I removed them from the database), but most of the problematic edits were undone. —usernamekiran (talk) 15:09, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Awesome, thank you! I'll try and go through and just remove them all if I can for my prior reasons, just wanted to make sure you were aware as well. Appreciate it Chew(VTE) 00:37, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions: Notable People to Write Wiki Article About

[edit]

Hello. I wish to SUGGEST three prominent people to write a Wiki article about. There actions affected 1000s of people across the USA and were in front of national media cameras. They graduated from my high school. But you are impartial. I cant add their names into Wiki content unless there is already an article about them. Here are the suggested Three Names and Major Newspaper Articles or Bio Sites about them to help you write a suggested article. They often made quite a few articles and headlines! These articles or Bios were all retrieved today, July 5, 2025.

They are:

  • Rex Meredith

https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0580625/ https://www.laughfactory.com/comedians/RexMeredith https://everythingcarson.com/carsonnugget/events/rex-meredith https://www.gettyimages.com/photos/rex-meredith https://www.sierrasun.com/news/funny-man-rex-meredith-has-a-lot-to-say/ https://lexnightclub.com/event/ev294955dt180928rm294148-reno-tahoe-comedy-presents-rex-meredith/reno-tahoe-comedy-presents-rex-meredith-180928/

  • Dale Ross (aka Lloyd Dale Ross)

https://ilsr.org/articles/georgetown-texas-voices-of-100-podcast/ https://www.statesman.com/story/news/2017/10/23/how-georgetown-s-gop-mayor/10076897007/ https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/the-conservative-texas-mayor-leading-the-charge-with-renewable-energy-on-the-green-new-deal/ https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/republican-mayor-texas-clean-energy-no-brainer-n769056 https://www.c-span.org/person/dale-ross/117515/ https://www.digi.city/what-were-reading-1/2018/3/20/mayor-dale-ross-and-georgetown-tx-getting-national-recognition-for-going-all-green https://www.cbsnews.com/news/how-conservative-georgetown-texas-became-renewable-energy-leader-mayor-dale-ross-2019-04-23/ https://www.smithsonianmag.com/innovation/texas-town-future-renewable-energy-180968410/ https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-12-04/why-republican-mayor-dale-ross-is-all-in-on-renewables https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/dale-ross-georgetown-renewables-calgary-1.4839431 https://time.com/3761952/georgetown-texas-fossil-fuel-renewable-energy/ https://cbsaustin.com/news/local/newspaper-reporter-says-georgetown-mayor-threatened-her https://www.statesman.com/story/news/local/flash-briefing/2020/01/27/georgetown-mayor-ross-wont-seek-reelection/1817648007/

  • Dayna Steele

https://www.palmdesertlibrary.org/event/author-talk-surviving-alzheimers-friends-facebook-and-really-big-glass-wine-dayna-steele-3186 https://canvasrebel.com/meet-dayna-steele/ https://www.houstonpress.com/music/foxy-lady-to-bitch-dayna-steeles-houston-radio-odyssey-6524655 https://ballotpedia.org/Dayna_Steele https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00639419/ https://tv.apple.com/us/show/dayna-steele-rock-the-36th/umc.cmc.4anb064d3njxdtqe4tfd8euoy https://thegamechanger.network/dayna-steele-surviving-alzheimers-friends-facebook-really-big-glass-wine/ https://rock101movie.com/category/dayna-steele/ https://www.opensecrets.org/political-action-committees-pacs/democratic-party-of-texas/C00639419/summary/2024 https://justfacts.votesmart.org/candidate/biography/177059/dayna-steele https://www.ktre.com/2024/10/04/radio-host-dayna-steele-challenges-us-rep-babins-seat-minus-public-donations/ https://www.houstonchronicle.com/opinion/endorsements/article/brian-babin-dayna-steele-election-endorsement-19829819.php https://texaslifestylemag.com/living-texas/five-minutes-with-rock-star-principles-dayna-steele/

Thank you for these considerations! Stevespacek1 (talk) 19:36, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Full Review of Ravi Kumar Punia Article

[edit]

Hello fellow editors,

I’m currently working on the Ravi Kumar Punia article and would appreciate it if someone with more experience could review the entire page for structure, formatting, and adherence to Wikipedia’s content guidelines.

My goal is to ensure the article is well-organized, neutrally written, and properly sourced. If you notice any areas that need improvement—such as notability, tone, layout, or citation quality—I would be grateful for your feedback or any edits you may suggest. I’m happy to collaborate and make revisions where needed to ensure the article meets Wikipedia’s standards.

Thank you for your time and assistance!

Best regards, 2405:201:5C08:41E5:13D:7B24:9154:3157 (talk) 15:01, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bug on nlwiki

[edit]

Hey, there's a bug with your bot on nlwiki where nieuwsblad.be links are getting converted to hbvl.be, even though nieuwsblad.be doesn't use AMP. You can see it happening in these diffs: 69654475, 69574270.

Could you take a look at what's causing this? It's messing up citations and potentially affecting other Belgian news sites too (though not entirely sure). XXBlackburnXx (talk) 21:11, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@XXBlackburnXx: Hello. The bot is thinking the original URL is an AMP url because of the "amper" in it. Then the bot is trying to find a canonical URL for that amp url. The issue is, original URL/page (nieuwsblad.be) is mentioning the hbvl.be URL as the canonical urls. Looking at the pages, they both seem to be exactly the same. If you want, I can blacklist the hbvl.be URLs. Kindly let me know how should I proceed. —usernamekiran (talk) 22:00, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Blacklisting would be nice. The main issue isn't necessarily the websites themselves, but rather that when a site within a citation is replaced with hbvl.be, the rest of the citation parameters, such as |publisher= or |work=, no longer match appropriately. Hope you understand :). XXBlackburnXx (talk) 22:22, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@XXBlackburnXx: ah, I see. no issues. I have fixed added the domain to the blacklist. —usernamekiran (talk) 22:39, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@XXBlackburnXx: Hi. I was going through the logs of the bot, and I came across:
Failed to save Limburg United in het seizoen 2025/26 on nl.wikipedia: Edit to page nl:Limburg United in het seizoen 2025/26 disallowed by the AbuseFilter.
This action has been automatically identified as harmful, and therefore disallowed. If you believe your action was constructive, please inform an administrator of what you were trying to do. A brief description of the abuse rule which your action matched is: KiranBOT bug

I could not find the edit filter on nlwiki. Has it been deleted/deactivated? —usernamekiran (talk) 04:16, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your bot on Chinese Wikipedia

[edit]

Hello, and thanks for your bot, KiranBOT’s contributions. According to Chinese Wikipedia policy, global bots are required to obtain local approval unless they are solely performing tasks related to fixing interwiki links or double redirects (policy). Please submit a request for local approval at this page. Otherwise, your bot may be temporarily blocked. Thank you for your understanding! Stang 00:17, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Stang: Hello. Thanks for reaching out. I had gone through the policy page beforehand, I misunderstood the policy — I thought global bots were allowed. I will stop KiranBOT in a couple of hours from now. Thanks again, —usernamekiran (talk) 00:57, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Stang: done, and brfa filed. —usernamekiran (talk) 03:39, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Article Request: TRMS (The Real Me Studios)

[edit]

Hi Usernamekiran, I noticed that there's no article yet for TRMS (The Real Me Studios), even though it's listed on MusicBrainz and is the label behind artist SXMRXXT and releases like NOTHING IS OFFICIAL. Since you enjoy working on overlooked topics, I was wondering if you'd be willing to create a stub for it? It would really mean a lot. Thank you! 117.194.108.43 (talk) 02:12, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 117.194.108.43 I could not find any information on TRMS (The Real Me Studios). I will have to say it fails the notability criteria for organisations. In short, to be notable, an entity must have significant coverage in reliable sources. —usernamekiran (talk) 02:31, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bot speed

[edit]

Hello! I kindly ask you to increase the delay time of the bot in the Russian Wikipedia after edits made by unregistered users and newly registered accounts. At the moment, your bot makes edits just a few seconds after any change. Sometimes such edits include vandalism or other violations, which makes them harder to detect or leads to incorrect reverts (1, 2, 3). I would like to request that the bot’s edits be made only a few days after such changes. Mitte27 (talk) 09:25, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Mitte27: Hello. I understand your point. The bot's edit are whitelisted, so the vandalism must get whitelisted as well. I'm currently out of town. I will get back home in 4-5 days. I will look at it as soon as I get home. —usernamekiran (talk) 13:59, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Purpose of having KiranBOT

[edit]

Hi Kiran, I just read User:KiranBOT/AMP which explains what is done and how is that done, but I missed a reasoning about why Wikipedia needs this done. Is removing AMP done to improve reader experience, to reduce the data flow to Google, to work around bugs or for some other reason ?

If Wikipedia already has a place where this is explained, I would be happy if you could link there from the bot's page, otherwise could you please add a section "Reasoning" or the like to this page ? Thank you, -- Juergen 5.147.163.199 (talk) 15:11, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Juergen. Yes, you are correct, I somehow missed/forgot to add the reasoning section. I will do it soon. You are correct. It is not entirely to "reduce the data flow to Google". The AMP URLs are, in short, privacy invasive; and they also pose a security risk. The other reason is that AMP URLs often seem to become non-operational after a while. That creates difficulties with Wikipedia's verifiability policy in case the URL was not archived. So it is preferable to use the canonical URLs. Thanks for reminding, I will add the "reasoning" section soon. —usernamekiran (talk) 16:42, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Ddelehanty (23:01, 16 October 2025)

[edit]

Hello, I am trying to create an English version of a page. https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9A%D1%80%D1%83%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%86%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%9C%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%BE Is this possible to do? --Ddelehanty (talk) 23:01, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Ddelehanty: Hello. Yes, it is possible to create am English version of that article. I have posted some useful links on your talkpage, you should also see this one: Help:Your first article. Let me know if you have any doubts. —usernamekiran (talk) 03:44, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Pastorjkl on Free Gospel Church (23:33, 16 October 2025)

[edit]

Hello. I’m trying to edit the page for Free Gospel Churches. I am a current board member of FGBI (The Church’s Bible Institute). There are totally unsubstantiated allegations published. --Pastorjkl (talk) 23:33, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Pastorjkl: Hello. I am not much experienced with that particular topic. But you would get more help at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Christianity/Noticeboard. It is a noticeboard/discussion page for articles (pages) related to Christianity, including Free Gospel Church. You will get input from multiple editors who are experienced in that topic. Let me know if you have any general questions. Regards, —usernamekiran (talk) 03:48, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Pastorjkl on Free Gospel Church (23:44, 16 October 2025)

[edit]

Hello, I am trying to edit unsubstantiated accusations and hate speech from the page for Free Gospel Churches. --Pastorjkl (talk) 23:44, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of sports figures considered the greatest

[edit]

Hey Kiran, for some reason the references at List of sports figures considered the greatest are not displaying anymore. Not sure if it was because of the recent KiranBot edit or not, but it just happened. Let me know your thoughts. GOAT Bones231012 (talk) 01:50, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@GOAT Bones231012: there was an issue with template:reflist. It had been discussed in the past at WP:VPT, and is currently (indirectly/tangentially) being discussed at Wikipedia:Bot requests#List-defined references format. It is not a well-known/well-publicised issue. I will post this incident there just to be sure. thanks for pointing it out. —usernamekiran (talk) 02:42, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for fixing and big fan of the KiranBot btw. GOAT Bones231012 (talk) 02:45, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@GOAT Bones231012: no problem. and appreciation is always appreciated. thank you for the kind words. I posted the incident the aforementioned discussion as well. —usernamekiran (talk) 02:48, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of administrators without tools

[edit]
Greetings, Usernamekiran. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title:
  • Thank you for supporting this effort. Your contributions are an integral part of overall success, and an example for others to follow.
  • To stop receiving these notifications, remove your name from the list.

TolBot (talk) 21:00, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Luca Ramos Ponzo (18:51, 20 October 2025)

[edit]

Hello --Luca Ramos Ponzo (talk) 18:51, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-43

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 19:33, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 20 October 2025

[edit]
And the "Global Resource Distribution Committee" emerges.
Two shortlisted WMF Board candidates removed from the ballot.
Who was bumped and why?
...while Musk prepares to launch "Grokipedia".
Serial-killer miniseries, deceased scientist, government shutdowns and Sandalwood hit "Kantara" crowd the tubes.
Don't get too excited before you read this.

Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 23:30, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Global bot approval request for SchlurcherBot

[edit]

Question from FreethoughtCameron (22:55, 22 October 2025)

[edit]

Hello! i have a question regarding searching for articles to edit. in my case https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservatism_in_the_United_States in multiple spots the article is biased using cherry picking and opinionated languages, both in favor of Conservatism and against it. in order for wiki users to have an article, more free from bias (although i admit, i am human) information, the article must be edited in order to achieve relative equality both in favor, and against conservatism. My question is: How do i edit a specific article? Thank you very much for your time and have a great day/night! --FreethoughtCameron (talk) 22:55, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Jedi Pikmin (03:15, 25 October 2025)

[edit]

Hello! What edits need citations and what don't? --Jedi Pikmin (talk) 03:15, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Wikipedia style and naming request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Infoboxes on a "Wikipedia style and naming" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 18:31, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-44

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 19:28, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--GiftedGirI (talk) 23:13, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Editnotices/Page/Template:Old moves/doc

[edit]

Hi usernamekiran. I came across Template:Editnotices/Page/Template:Old moves/doc and noticed that it doesn't seem to be serving any purpose now (the sandbox link is broken, and even if fixed, it would redirect to the doc page). I was planning to send it to TfD but decided to ask for your thoughts on it first. jlwoodwa (talk) 20:11, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jlwoodwa. I have no issues with deletion, I will request for speedy after this edit. There were a few moves, and rewrites of the template, and doc. It was created as part of me trying to simplify the documentation, but then it was redirected and moved (page history) The current documentation is not confusing, and that particular edit notice has been rendered useless as well. Thanks for contacting me first, it saved a lot of community time at Tfd. It is appreciated a lot. —usernamekiran (talk) 10:04, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Speedy deletion on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 20:30, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]