User talk:Plutus/Archive 2

Women in Red March 2025

Women in Red | March 2025, Vol 11, Issue 3, Nos. 326, 327, 332, 333, 334

Online events:

New: Alphabet run E & F | Artists+Activists | Women of the Arab World
Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music

Announcements from other communities:

Tip of the month:

You can access the Wikipedia Library if you have made 500+ edits, and 6+ months editing,
and 10+ edits in the last 30 days, and No active blocks

Moving the needle:^[1]

27 Jan 2025: 20.031% of biographies on EN-WP are about women (2,047,793 bios, 410,200 women)
23 Dec 2024: 20.009% (2,041,741 bios, 408,531 women)

Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 1,669 articles during this period!

Other ways to participate:

Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications.
Join the conversations on our talkpage.
Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project.
Follow us on social media:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:56, 25 February 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Why

Did you make this revert? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Peace_%26_Dialogue_Leadership_Initiative&diff=prev&oldid=1277314360

It obviously was not vandalism. Yet you reverted - without any edit summary. That is not appropriate. See Wikipedia:FIES.

It obviously was appropriate text. Simply read the first sentence of the article.

I would urge you to self-revert. 2603:7000:2101:AA00:44F9:2D4:FCC9:BE1D (talk) 23:09, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@2603:7000:2101:AA00:44F9:2D4:FCC9:BE1D wrong link? Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 02:06, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No. --2603:7000:2101:AA00:44F9:2D4:FCC9:BE1D (talk) 02:51, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2603:7000:2101:AA00:44F9:2D4:FCC9:BE1D, Really sorry, I was using SWVIEWER and made the undo on the wrong wikipedia, thanks for spotting it out. — Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 11:04, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. 2603:7000:2101:AA00:BC7A:7C81:F7C1:E537 (talk) 03:55, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A cupcake for you!

Thank you Cactus, for your guidance in creating a new category! Thanks! :) SunnyBoi (talk) 07:49, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

SunnyBoi, Thanks!! — Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 07:51, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Bulbinella rossii on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 10:30, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Tornado outbreak of December 28–29, 2024 on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:31, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: History Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Ostjuden on a "History" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:31, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mademoiselle Mante (February 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Remsense was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:NACTOR. It is demonstrated that she has had several roles in notable works, but not that they were major roles.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mademoiselle Mante and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Remsense ‥ 论 09:53, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cactusisme! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Remsense ‥ 论 09:53, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

About the "Infinite void of blackness" page

The only reason the redirect got declined was because a user named Nmammad vandalized it. I don't think it was a fair decline. Kjjj6uhhhhh (talk) 16:45, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kjjj6uhhhhh, I will take a look again — Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 03:09, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kjjj6uhhhhh, It still seem to be an unlikely search term? — Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 03:33, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Keppel Coastal Trail (March 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Justiyaya was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

no secondary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Keppel Coastal Trail and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Justi yaya 04:56, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: History Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Massacre in Budy on a "History" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 10:30, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: History Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:2006 Yemen prison escape on a "History" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:30, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 10:24, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CHU/S

Clerking at CHU is welcome, please use the clerk communication templates when appropriate. Please do not mark requests as {{done}} or {{notdone}} as the archiving bot will not recognize them unless a renamer posts it. Cheers, - FlightTime (open channel) 04:48, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, alright. Thanks Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 04:48, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@FlightTime what are the templates? Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 04:50, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The clerking templates appear in the page header while the edit window is open. {{CHU/doc}} - FlightTime (open channel) 04:54, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

okay Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 06:39, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Keppel Coastal Trail (March 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ktkvtsh was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
Essay-like writing
Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
Close paraphrasing

Please address these issues. The best way to do it is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Keppel Coastal Trail and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ktkvtsh (talk) 03:31, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ktkvtsh, Can you take a look and show me some examples? — Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 04:20, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The elevated boardwalk section is one example. It reads as promotional rather than encyclopedic. AI usually words sentences this way. I could be wrong.

Could you work on dialing back the promotional tone and focus on making it objective and encyclopedic. Best, Ktkvtsh (talk) 23:37, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

okay Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 10:24, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Ktkvtsh now? Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 10:29, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You can certainly resubmit it for review and another reviewer will take a look. Ktkvtsh (talk) 20:28, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 08:20, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – March 2025

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2025).

Administrator changes

CheckUser changes

Oversighter changes

AmandaNP

Guideline and policy news

A request for comment is open to discuss whether AI-generated images (meaning those wholly created by generative AI, not human-created images modified with AI tools) should be banned from use in articles.
A series of 22 mini-RFCs that double-checked consensus on some aspects and improved certain parts of the administrator elections process has been closed (see the summary of the changes).
A request for comment is open to gain consensus on whether future administrator elections should be held.

Technical news

A new filter has been added to the Special:Nuke tool, which allows administrators to filter for pages in a range of page sizes (in bytes). This allows, for example, deleting pages only of a certain size or below. T378488
Non-administrators can now check which pages are able to be deleted using the Special:Nuke tool. T376378

Miscellaneous

The 2025 appointees for the Ombuds commission are だ＊ぜ, Arcticocean, Ameisenigel, Emufarmers, Faendalimas, Galahad, Nehaoua, Renvoy, Revi C., RoySmith, Teles and Zafer as members, with Vermont serving as steward-observer.
Following the 2025 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: 1234qwer1234qwer4, AramilFeraxa, Daniuu, KonstantinaG07, MdsShakil and XXBlackburnXx.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:37, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

@Remsense, I pretty sure she is notable and she played a few major roles in some of the films — Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 11:31, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Citations to more than one dictionary would help very much to establish that fact. Remsense ‥ 论 11:32, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Remsense, dictionary? — Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 11:33, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

this? — Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 11:37, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm referring to the single dictionary you have cited in the article. Remsense ‥ 论 11:41, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Remsense, https://lesarchivesduspectacle.net/s/71294-Mademoiselle-de-Belle-Isle — Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 11:49, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Remsense, ? — Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 02:58, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What about it? There's exactly one source of substance in the article; this is just a record as far I can tell, and isn't verifying anything than a particular role she played, which wasn't the concern. Remsense ‥ 论 03:01, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Omilteme cottontail on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: History Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Flag of Lebanon on a "History" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:30, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Weather of 2008 on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:30, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: History Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Royal Foundation on a "History" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 10:30, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback requests from the Feedback Request Service

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Xanthoria parietina and Talk:Spilonema revertens on "Natural sciences" Good Article nominations. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:30, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback requests from the Feedback Request Service

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Peltula and Talk:Lecanora albellula on "Natural sciences" Good Article nominations. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:30, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: History Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Croatian Committee on a "History" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Biographies request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:B. R. Ambedkar on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:31, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback requests from the Feedback Request Service

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Caccothryptus yunnanensis and Talk:Caccothryptus on "Natural sciences" Good Article nominations. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:30, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Kabwe 1 on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:30, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: History Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Massacre in Budy on a "History" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:30, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: History Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Aaron Burr on a "History" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:30, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

March 2025

Hi Cactusisme! I noticed that you recently made an edit at Sam Sulek and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia: it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Justjourney (talk) 23:02, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if it's the the tool you're using, but if someone forgets to add a source, I don't think you should check the minor edit box. Justjourney (talk) 23:13, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Uhh swviewer auto marks all edits as minor edits @Justjourney Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 23:29, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

oh, I see. Justjourney (talk) 23:32, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. Justjourney (talk) 23:34, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Antennacanthopodia on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:30, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Transgender health care misinformation on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:30, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Arthropleura on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:30, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Cyclone Chido on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:30, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Cactusisme! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Help, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:11, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You declined a redirect, asking for a source .. but ..

the source was already supplied in the request, for Zioness. Exactly as is the norm in redirect requests. Relevant aspects below.

Target of redirect: Amanda Berman

Reason: She is the founder and director of Zioness, which does not have its own article

Source (if applicable): [1] "Amanda Berman, Founder of Zioness ..."

2603:7000:2101:AA00:3007:95C2:F1D4:565E (talk) 19:35, 6 March 2025 (UTC) ...

Declined. The title you suggested seems like an unlikely search term. Could you provide a source showing that it is a commonly used alternative name or related topic? (Zioness) Cactus🌵 spiky ouch  10:08, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

Kindly reconsider and approve. Thank you. 2603:7000:2101:AA00:BC5F:5D0F:C933:525E (talk) 19:30, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Where did you post this on? Please provide diff link Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 03:31, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On the request redirect page. We ran into another problem very much like this recently. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_creation/Redirects/2025-03#Redirect_request:_Zioness,_Zioness_Movement 2603:7000:2101:AA00:F9CF:AC80:343:CD51 (talk) 04:39, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please submit a new request Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 10:32, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Is that really necessary? I did it correctly the first time. It seems like needless hoops for editors to have to resubmit requests that have been properly submitted in the first instance. --2603:7000:2101:AA00:F9CF:AC80:343:CD51 (talk) 18:50, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@2603:7000:2101:AA00:F9CF:AC80:343:CD51 If you don't submit a new requests, I can't do anything. It doesn't take that much time. Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 22:17, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I will do it. Thanks.But it does strike me that editors should not have to do the work of finding the ref to the error when the specifics were pointed out. And refile. When the error was not theirs. If it does not take much time, I was thinking the person making the error could themselves make the submission that "doesn't take much time" . --2603:7000:2101:AA00:F9CF:AC80:343:CD51 (talk) 00:25, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 10:16, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bulbinella rossii

Hi Cactusisme. I would like to remind you about the ongoing review on the Bulbinella rossii article. I understand you might be busy (or focused on other articles at the moment). I will likely be off-wiki this weekend. Thanks. Alexeyevitch^(talk) 20:40, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Will take a look Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 04:47, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback granted

Hi Cactusisme. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:

Being granted rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or Ultraviolet. It just adds a [Rollback] button next to a page's latest live revision - that's all. It does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you.
Rollback should be used to revert clear and unambiguous cases of vandalism only. Never use rollback to revert good faith edits.
Rollback should never be used to edit war, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose or any other inappropriate purpose, the rights will be revoked.
Use common sense. If you're not sure about something, ask!

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Joyous! Noise! 03:10, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 03:18, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File rename requests

Just a FYI, there is no need to sign the template, page history logs who is placing the request. Cheers, - FlightTime (open channel) 22:20, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@FlightTime Alright, thanks. Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 01:02, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please familiarize yourself with WP:FMNN, some of your requests are just styling fixes which is discouraged. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 02:22, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Minorax Just a question, is fixing pokemon to Pokémon part of this? Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 10:16, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion, yes. It doesn't change anything other than adding diacritics. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 15:46, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Illegal immigration to the United States on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:31, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

175.1175. 175.157.189.125 (talk) 23:13, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red April 2025

Women in Red | April 2025, Vol 11, Issue 4, Nos. 326, 327, 335, 336

Online events:

New: Alphabet run G & H | Business
Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music

Announcements (Events facilitated by others):

The European Destubathon – a stub improvement contest/editathon from 1–30 April 2025

Tip of the month:

When creating biographies, don't forget to use Template:DEFAULTSORT.
Accessible from "Wiki markup" at the foot of the page being edited,
it allows categories to be listed under the subject's family name rather than their first or given name.

Moving the needle: (statistics available via Humaniki tool)

24 Mar 2025: 20.070% of biographies on EN-WP are about women (2,057,083, 412,857 women)
27 Jan 2025: 20.031% (2,047,793 bios, 410,200 women)

Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 2,657 articles during this period!

Other ways to participate:

Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications.
Join the conversations on our talkpage.
Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project.
Follow us on social media:

Instagram | Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 13:17, 30 March 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Swamp rabbit on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:30, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: History Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Emirate of Erzincan on a "History" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:31, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – April 2025

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2025).

Administrator changes

Dennis Brown

Bureaucrat changes

Barkeep49

CheckUser changes

0xDeadbeef

Oversighter changes

GB fan

Moneytrees

Miscellaneous

Sign up for The Core Contest, a competition running from 15 April to 31 May to improve vital articles.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:45, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Forspoken on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:31, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Resubmission: Draft:Junghun Choi – revised with inline citations and reliable secondary sources

Hello,

I’m following up regarding the draft Draft:Junghun Choi, which was previously declined due to a lack of inline citations and sufficient secondary sources.

The article has now been substantially revised and improved:

- All major claims are now supported with inline <ref> citations. - Reliable secondary sources have been added, including:

 • Fortune Korea  
 • Chosun Biz  
 • The Korea Daily  
 • AMCHAM Korea  
 • Golf Inc. (via Sports Chosun)

- Duplicate or unreliable references have been removed. - The draft follows the guidelines for Biographies of Living Persons (BLP).

Kindly review the updated draft at your convenience.

Thank you very much! 방명호 (talk) 14:56, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@방명호 It was already reviewed by another reviewer, who had left some comments there. Please take a look. I also suggest reading through sources. Thanks. Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 09:26, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your follow-up and suggestion.

I have carefully reviewed the previous comments and made substantial improvements to the draft based on that feedback.

Specifically:

- All sources have now been converted to inline citations using <ref> and the {{cite news}}: Empty citation (help) template, per WP:CITE guidelines.

- The article relies exclusively on independent, secondary sources such as BusinessKorea, Korea JoongAng Daily, Yonhap News, and The Korea Herald—there are no interviews, press releases, or social media links.

- Any primary or non-independent sources were removed, and the article content was restructured to ensure neutrality and verifiability.

Please let me know if any additional improvements are required. I sincerely appreciate your time and guidance.

Thank you once again for reviewing this submission.

All content has been thoroughly updated to meet Wikipedia's verifiability and notability standards. Please feel free to suggest any additional improvements. I truly appreciate your time and consideration.

Respectfully,

방명호

--> 방명호 (talk) 08:38, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@방명호 It was declined again by @Sophisticatedevening, please ask the reviewer for more comments. Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 09:19, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The draft

you know that this submission is Contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia because the title shows it but you cannot have only decline it because of its title. 38.96.255.213 (talk) 10:15, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It is blatant vandalism and it was a deleted page. Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 10:19, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit, when to accept an edit

* Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:03, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Pppery Thanks Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 22:15, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Miscellaneous Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Walther Dobbertin on a "Miscellaneous" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:31, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Trialeti culture on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:31, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Trains on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:31, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red May 2025

Women in Red | May 2025, Vol 11, Issue 5, Nos. 326, 327, 337, 338

Online events:

New: Revolutionary women | Alphabet run I & J
Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music

Announcements (events facilitated by others):

WikiProject Women in Green - a Good Article editathon from 1-31 May 2025

Progress ("moving the needle"):

Statistics available via Humaniki tool. Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 1,269 articles during this period!

21 Apr 2025: 20.090% of EN-WP biographies are about women (2,061,363; 414,126 women)
24 Mar 2025: 20.070% (2,057,083 bios; 412,857 women)

Tip of the month:

Those of you who experience harassment while trying to create or improve articles about women
are welcome to bring your problems to our attention on the Women in Red talk page.

Other ways to participate:

Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications.
Join the conversations on our talkpage.
Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project.
Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Lajmmoore (talk 09:19, 29 April 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Megalobulimus dryades on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:30, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: History Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Women of the Young Lords on a "History" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:31, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – May 2025

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2025).

Administrator changes

Rusalkii

NaomiAmethyst (overlooked last month)

Interface administrator changes

Galobtter

Guideline and policy news

Following an RfC, administrator elections were permanently authorized on a five-month schedule. The next election will be scheduled soon; see Wikipedia talk:Administrator elections for more information. This is an alternate process to the RfA process and does not replace the latter.
An RfC was closed with consensus to allow editors to opt-out of seeing "sticky decorative elements". Such elements should now be wrapped in {{sticky decoration wrapper}}. Editors who wish to opt out can follow the instructions at WP:STICKYDECO.
An RfC has resulted in a broad prohibition on the use of AI-generated images in articles. A few common-sense exceptions are recognized.

Miscellaneous

A New Pages Patrol backlog drive is happening in May 2025 to reduce the backlog of articles in the new pages feed. Sign up here to participate!

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:01, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Keppel Coastal Trail (June 1)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by NeoGaze was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This draft clearly appears to have been generated by an AI with little to no change from the author. In addition, the subject itself is far from being notable enough.

NeoGaze (talk) 22:26, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@NeoGaze R u sure thus should be rejected and not declined. This does not violate any policies? Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 23:03, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Cactusisme Hello Cactus. I decided to reject the draft because the subject itself is not notable, and there has been little improvement since its first decline. If it was article it would have been almost certainly speedily deleted for its lack of notability. The fact it is also clearly derived after the output of an AI does not help. If I saw signs of the draft improving I would have probably declined it.

I hope I have resolved your questions do not feel discouraged! I made plenty of mistakes when I made my first two articles, you just have to find a more suitable topic. NeoGaze (talk) 23:22, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cactusisme! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! NeoGaze (talk) 22:26, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@NeoGaze Okay, thanks Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 01:20, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of administrators without tools

	Greetings, Cactusisme. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title: Chaotic Enby
Thank you for supporting this effort. Your contributions are an integral part of overall success, and an example for others to follow. To stop receiving these notifications, remove your name from the list.

TolBot (talk) 21:00, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red June 2025

Women in Red | June 2025, Vol 11, Issue 6, Nos. 326, 327, 339, 340

Online events:

New: LGBTQ+ | Alphabet run K & L
Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music

Announcements:

Who are the most overlooked and interesting Women in Red? We've no idea,
but we're putting together our list of the 100 most interesting ex-Women in Red.
We are creating the list to celebrate 10 years of Women in Red and we hope to present it at Wikimania.
We are ignoring the obvious, so do you have a name or subject we should consider?
Can you suggest a DYK style hook?
If you are shy about editing that page, you are welcome to add ideas and comments on the talk page.
The World Destubathon, 16 June - 13 July, 2025

Progress ("moving the needle"):

Statistics available via Humaniki tool. Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 1,492 articles during this period!

19 May 2025: 20.114% of EN-WP biographies are about women (2,066,280; 415,618 women)
21 Apr 2025: 20.090% (2,061,363 bios; 414,126 women)

Tip of the month:

Every language Wikipedia has its own policies regarding notability and reliable sources.
Before translating an article from one language Wikipedia into English Wikipedia, research
the subject and verify that the translated article will meet English Wikipedia's policy requirements.

Other ways to participate:

Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications.
Join the conversations on our talkpage.
Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project.
Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Lajmmoore (talk 06:03, 29 May 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Brillant 755 has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Brillant 755. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 16:08, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Ozzie10aaaa Thanks Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 00:42, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: History Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Hugh O'Neill, 4th Baron Dungannon on a "History" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:31, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Babur on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:30, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Typhoon Krathon on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:31, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – June 2025

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2025).

Administrator changes

Interface administrator changes

0xDeadbeef

CheckUser changes

L235

Oversight changes

L235

Guideline and policy news

An RfC is open to determine whether the English Wikipedia community should adopt a position on AI development by the WMF and its affiliates.

Technical news

A new feature called Multiblocks will be deployed on English Wikipedia on the week of June 2. See the relevant announcement on the administrators' noticeboard.
History merges performed using the mergehistory special page are now logged at both the source and destination, rather than just the source as previously, after this RFC and the resolution of T118132.

Arbitration

An arbitration case named Indian military history has been opened. Evidence submissions for this case close on 8 June.

Miscellaneous

Voting for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) election is open until 17 June 2025. Read the voting page on Meta-Wiki and cast your vote here!
An Articles for Creation backlog drive is happening in June 2025, with over 1,600 drafts awaiting review from the past two months. In addition to AfC participants, all administrators and new page patrollers can help review using the Yet Another AFC Helper Script, which can be enabled in the Gadgets settings. Sign up here to participate!
The Unreferenced articles backlog drive is happening in June 2025 to reduce the backlog of articles tagged with {{Unreferenced}}. You can help reduce the backlog by adding citations to these articles. Sign up to participate!

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:16, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Singapore Meetup June 2025

Hello,

You are receiving this message because your name was listed at one or more of the following locations: Wikipedia:WikiProject Singapore/Members#Active members, Wikipedia:Meetup/Singapore#Interested participants, or meta:Wikimedians of Singapore User Group#Members. As part of an effort to foster closer collaboration and community engagement, your username has been consolidated into a general mailing list for future updates, such as local meetup announcements and occasional newsletters. You can expect no more than 1–2 messages per month.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.

In case you haven’t heard, Wikimedians of Singapore User Group has been formed to support Singaporean or Singapore-based editors like yourself. You’re warmly invited to join us and learn more about our goals at metawiki, or feel free to reach out to me directly if you have questions or would like to get involved.

We’re also excited to share that our next meetup is taking place at Starbucks, Punggol Coast Mall on 13 June 2025, 6:00PM - 8.30PM. Full details and the registration form can be found at Event:Singapore Meetup June 2025. We’d love to see you there!

Warm regards,

– robertsky (talk) 02:46, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Shreykanani1001/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Shreykanani1001/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -- Least Action (talk) 04:13, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Least Action why are you informing me? This is not my page. Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 04:15, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, it's automated by Twinkle. -- Least Action (talk) 14:37, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My submission at Articles for creation: Video Game Museum of CADPA (June 3) has not been accepted

I recently received your feedback indicating that some of the sources cited in my draft "Video Game Museum of CADPA" may not be considered reliable. I truly want to improve the draft in accordance with Wikipedia's standards, but I am unsure which specific sources are in question.Several of the references I included are from well-established Chinese media outlets and official websites, as well as one from a reputable Korean news organization. These are considered credible and authentic within our local context.I would be very grateful if you could kindly clarify which specific sources are deemed unreliable, and provide guidance on how I might revise or replace them to meet Wikipedia's requirements. Your help would mean a lot to me. 周也 (talk) 03:47, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@周也 You could read Wp:Secondary sources Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 07:23, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Are you saying that I lack a primary source? Or are you suggesting that some of the four secondary sources I cited are unreliable? If it's the former, I'd like to point out that the information from Baidu (China’s largest search engine) is generally considered trustworthy in China. However, Wikipedia classifies it as a deprecated source. In that case, should I still include the Baidu citation? If it’s the latter, please directly point out which source you consider unreliable, because from my perspective, they are all reliable—the media outlets that produced them are reputable. 周也 (talk) 08:21, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No you need more primary sources and you need to make sure very point is cited properly. Add more secondary sources, so that it is notable. Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 10:10, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also, it needs independent sources:

(http://jinbao.people.cn): Reliable, not independent, National-level Chinese media, but it may not be fully independent of the museum's organizers. Primary source

(https://www.shanghai.gov.cn) reliable but not independent, primary source.

(http://sh.news.cn) Reliable, independent This is a good source

(https://www.inven.co.kr) Reliable, independent This is a good source Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 10:21, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much. I really appreciate that. 周也 (talk) 10:25, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:2025 India–Pakistan conflict on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:30, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Happy First Edit Day, Cactusisme, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 04:37, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@DaniloDaysOfOurLives Thanks and have a nice day!! Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 00:41, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Miscellaneous Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Saturation diving on a "Miscellaneous" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:30, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Second Review After Edits

Hi @Cactusisme, thank you for your earlier review and feedback. I’ve fully rewritten the draft with a strict focus on neutrality and encyclopedic tone. The new version removes all promotional language and now cites multiple independent, reliable third-party sources: Jewish News (UK) Jewish Press (USA) KosherLDN (industry-specific news) Business Mole (partnership announcement)

All claims are now directly backed by these sources, and there is no reliance on the company’s own website beyond the homepage. I am encouraged to see a kosher food business working to improve access and innovation in a sector that has often lagged digitally. That's why I have been trying to create a page on this. I'd be very grateful if you would consider taking another look when you have time.

Many thanks! Eph EphGross (talk) 11:40, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@EphGross You need to declare if you have a Wp:COI with the article. Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 00:35, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You can submit the draft for review if you would like another review, but I suggest on working on something else as it is ‘’highly’’ unlikely it would get accepted Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 02:40, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Cactusisme, Thanks for your response. To clarify: I have no connection to Sabeny.com. I’m not employed by or affiliated with the company in any way.

I’m simply a kosher consumer who works in tech and has long been frustrated by the lack of digital innovation in the kosher food space, particularly in the UK. When I came across Sabeny, I saw it as one of the few companies moving things forward, and indeed saw that it has already received some independent coverage.

The draft is based entirely on third-party sources. Notably, The Jewish Press which is one one of the oldest and most influential Jewish newspapers in the US, ran a news report on the company’s partnership with Uber Eats, in the context of antisemitism and Jewish safety concerns. Jewish News (UK) and KosherLDN have also all reported on Sabeny. These are both independent publications with editorial standards, and none of the coverage appears to be paid or promotional.

I’ve aimed to write in a strictly neutral tone and understand the importance of verifiability and notability. I appreciate your time and guidance in the review process EphGross (talk) 10:01, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@EphGross Based on a quick glance, I feel like the Services section could be wp:neutral. I can give a more comprehensive review later, but a bit busy right now. Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 00:34, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A duplicate citation appears in the History section and should be removed. The Services section is too limited and would benefit from more detail on delivery areas, timelines, and operational specifics. In Media coverage, some phrasing—such as describing a service as “safer”—could be interpreted as non-neutral and should be reworded or more clearly attributed. The article also lacks context on Sabeny.com’s position within the broader kosher grocery market, including competitors or scale of operations Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 09:46, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Cactusisme Thanks, will work on it. 92.27.246.58 (talk) 09:48, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Cactusisme, thanks for your earlier feedback.

I’ve now revised the draft to address the points you raised:

1)Removed the duplicate citation

2)Expanded the Services section with more operational detail

3)Reworded the phrasing and ensured attribution

4)Added market context, including competitor references and scale of operation

I have also resubmitted the draft for review. If you’re able to take another look when you have time, I would appreciate it.

Thanks again EphGross (talk) 12:48, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@EphGross another editor reviwed it, try asking that editor for their opinion Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 09:30, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June Backlog Drive is almost over!

Hi! Thanks for participating in the Articles for Creation June Backlog Drive! We've done amazing work so far, dropping the backlog by more than 2000 drafts already. We have around 2800 drafts outstanding, and we need your help to get that down to zero in 5 days. We can do this, but we need all hands on deck to make this happen. A list of the pending drafts can be found at WP:AFCSORT, where you can select submissions in your area of interest. Thank you so much for your work so far, and happy reviewing! – DreamRimmer ■ 01:29, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Viva (Brazil) page move

I just noticed at the talk page that you close the discussion of page move as "No consensus". However, aside from the result of discussion, it now appears that the page move from Viva (Brazil) to Viva (Brazilian TV channel) is deemed no longer relevant or moot, because whenever there's a disagreement regarding Viva (Brazil) or Viva (Brazilian TV channel), the channel themselves is now rebranded as Globoplay Novelas (see Telenovelafan215's argument). So, could you evaluated again the result of move discussion, especially about post-June 9 rename as "Globoplay Novelas". 103.111.102.118 (talk) 21:34, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@103.111.102.118 Sure will take a look. Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 00:49, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, I took a look, I suggest starting a new discussion so that more people would participate in the discussion and there would be more things to work with. Many thanks, Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 03:13, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brillant 755 has been accepted

Brillant 755, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 16:09, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

About 2 articles

Hello, sorry for the inconvenience, I am a novice editor and I would like to know if the 2 articles I wrote (Draft: The Walt Disney Company Iberia and Draft: Disney Media Networks Latin America) meet the requirements to be accepted. Well, I decided to improve the one about Draft: Disney Media Networks Latin America by adding references after a reviewer rejected it because I had forgotten to add references. But I would like to know if you could accept them or how else I could improve them. CartoonsFan113 (talk) 01:38, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@CartoonsFan113 I am not really sure about such topics. Might want to ask the person who reviwed the articles. Thanks, Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 05:30, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks anyways, best regards :) CartoonsFan113 (talk) 05:50, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Article draft about Nicolas Lerner

Hi, I am surprised you have refused my proposal for this new article, as the 2 sources are from 2 of the most widely read newspapers in France. I intend to add many more sources from major english newspapers (The Times) or other international renowned media, relevant to this start of article, in English, such as:

Therefore, I kindly ask you to reconsider.
Also as this person is a major civil servant in France, Head of National Intelligence now, newly appointed, and now subject of many news publisehd by various reliable media.
Please also note that there is an article in the French Wiki about this person already.
Thank you Cheers Alceste sur son yacht (talk) 09:11, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am pretty sure my decline reason was clear, most of the sources (3/4), were from https://www.lemonde.fr. Good job in fixing that! You can wait for another user to review it. Thanks, Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 10:17, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for compliment. Can't you review it again, since critic was fixed? Thanks in advance, Alceste sur son yacht (talk) 10:36, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Le monde is like the NYTimes in terms of reputation and all. It might be worth giving it more weight in future reviews. That paper covering the subject probably means other papers are on it s well and it's probably worth it just to accept it even if there aren't as strong sourcing. Also, this particular subject probably meets WP:NPOL as Politicians and judges who have held international, national, or (for countries with federal or similar systems of government) state/province–wide office. Justi yaya 03:11, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Alceste sur son yacht The draft was accepted by someone else's, thanks, Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 06:07, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Holy Trinity Lock II (June 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The ref list sources aren't that great - could you replace with, for example, historical books/news articles/history etc. Or use the Bibliography books (which look reliable) to verify claims in the text.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Holy Trinity Lock II and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

qcne (talk) 15:07, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red July 2025

Women in Red | July 2025, Vol 11, Issue 7, Nos. 326, 327, 341, 342, 343

Online events:

New: Alphabet run M & N | Women in Red turns 10 | Kenya
Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music

Announcements:

The World Destubathon, 16 June - 13 July 2025

Progress ("moving the needle"):

Statistics available via Humaniki tool. Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 1,514 articles during this period!

19 May 2025: 20.114% of EN-WP biographies are about women (2,066,280 bios; 415,618 women)
23 Jun 2025: 20.130% (2,072,236 bios; 417,132 women)

Tip of the month:

A nuanced article is more useful than a shiny pedestal. Readers can find hope in your subject's survival or achievements,
but they can also learn from your subject's mistakes and limitations.

Other ways to participate:

Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications.
Join the conversations on our talkpage.
Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project.
Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Lajmmoore (talk 09:19, 30 June 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

^ "Humaniki".

[1] "Humaniki".

[1]