User talk:Markussep

This user is one of the 400 most active English Wikipedians of all time.

New Template

Hey, I'm Vestrix. I was wondering how to make a new infobox and I'm messaging you because I saw you made Template:Infobox_French_Subdivision and I really liked the style. I used it quite a bit in my intercommunity articles. I want to make smt similar but it gave me a warning saying it was a template loop. Could you look at it? The template is Template:Infobox French Consulate General. Thanks! Vestrix (talk) 18:44, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

Hi Vestrix, the template transcludes itself, that's what causes the loop. {{Infobox French subdivision}} is actually not an independent infobox template, but it's a wrapper for {{Infobox settlement}}. I suppose you could look for other articles about consulates or embassies, and see what kind of infoboxes they use. See for instance Embassy of the United States, London, that uses {{Infobox diplomatic mission}}. Maybe you can use that infobox. Markussep ^Talk 20:05, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

Ok, thank you! Vestrix (talk) 01:12, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

Aberdaron

Hi, can you do me a favour and update the demography for this for 2021 I guess it would be? It just needs the recent figures. I've just added a few citations to some unsourced claims. The article is up for GAR that's all. It's a good article, would be a shame to see it delisted. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:45, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

I tried to find the census results, but they're well hidden, I only found a rounded estimate for 2022: 900.

A goat for you!

For editing all those French geography articles!

- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 13:04, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

Czech stations

Hello
I remember a discussion on this a while ago (here), which you contributed to; I’ve opened a discussion on this at WT:Trains, if you wish to comment. Regards, Moonraker12 (talk) 17:52, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 October 10 § Defunct/disused/former railway stations

Categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 October 10 § Defunct/disused/former railway stations on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:56, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

"Șaaru River" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Șaaru River has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 November 15 § Șaaru River until a consensus is reached. ~2025-32085-07 (talk) 00:34, 15 November 2025 (UTC)

A Very Merry Christmas to you!

Hello there. 'Tis the season again, believe it or not, the years pass so quickly now! Your contributions to Wikipedia in 2025 are greatly appreciated! Wishing you a Very Merry Christmas, and here's to a happy and productive 2026! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:11, 18 December 2025 (UTC)

2022 Kyrgyzstani census

Hi there! Do you think you could help create a template for the 2022 Kyrgyzstani census, like the 2009 one? The results of the new census are available on the stat.gov.kg website, but the page is rather confusing. Here's a direct link to a PDF with the results in Russian. Nataev ^talk 22:52, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

Certainly, I’ll take a look at it in a week or so. Markussep ^Talk 17:46, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

Great, thank you very much! Nataev ^talk 20:46, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

I made a template for the 2022 census results, see {{Cite Kyrgyzstan census 2022}}. I also made a citation template for the 2025 population data for Kyrgyzstan, see {{Cite Kyrgyzstan population 2025}}. There is no archived version of that excel file yet, I'll check again in some weeks and add it if I find it. I added both templates to the Samarkandek article. Markussep ^Talk 20:53, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 December 28 § Kuşadası District

Categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 December 28 § Kuşadası District on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 23:54, 28 December 2025 (UTC)

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 December 29 § İznik District

Categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 December 29 § İznik District on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 00:01, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of Ribnitz-Damgarten (Amt) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ribnitz-Damgarten (Amt) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ribnitz-Damgarten (Amt) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

StarFox0Lover (talk) 07:32, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Coșei

The article Coșei has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability beyond basic statistics (length, tributary relationship) derivable from the Romanian river cadastre. No sources exist beyond the cadastral database entry, and web searches in both English and Romanian return no independent coverage of this 16 km stream. Per WP:NGEO, named natural features require information beyond statistics and coordinates to be known to exist; this article cannot be developed into an encyclopedic article using known sources, and the content could instead be covered in a sentence at Maja (river).

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. Bearian (talk) 04:18, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

About a list of administrative places in Turkey

I have stumbled upon your message in another user's page. I am able to think about some substitutes for this purpose, such as the Address-based Population System results which are published by Turkstat. It is accessible from here, however it doesn't provide a direct link nor lists any localities under 10-because under Turkish law if a place falls under 10 it must be administratively abolished (which will be published in the Official Gazette and will be connected into another locality with a village/neighbourhood administration. And also lists organized industrial zones. ahmetlii ^✉ _{(Please ping me on a reply!)} 15:24, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

@Ahmetlii: thanks, I already knew that system. There are lists of municipalities, villages, neighbourhoods etc. under the "Favorite Reports" link on https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/medas/?kn=95&locale=en. There were some differences in spelling etc. with the lists on https://www.e-icisleri.gov.tr/Anasayfa/MulkiIdariBolumleri.aspx, but unfortunately they're not live anymore. Markussep ^Talk 17:05, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

@Markussep Wait... I have never thought about checking the actual link. The second link you have mentioned is actually working when typed exactly; it's just not working with my foreign IP which is a common problem for government websites... I suppose they had blocked access to non-Turkish IPs.

And the list is up-to-date: I have checked it for a village, that I found to have its name changed on 15 February. If you manage to get a Turkish, preferably residential, IP through a VPN you might check it out for yourself. Or if you can't find one just mail to me; I'd be able to send any PDFs you might need or provide a proxy. ahmetlii ^✉ _{(Please ping me on a reply!)} 19:34, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Neighbourhoods in Doğanyol

A tag has been placed on Category:Neighbourhoods in Doğanyol indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:06, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

"Greek National Road 61" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Greek National Road 61 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 April 6 § Greek National Road 61 until a consensus is reached. Minoa (talk) 07:06, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dunărea (river)

The article Dunărea (river) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I think this entire article is based on a misunderstanding. There is not a distinct river called "Dunărea" here. The watercourse in question is just a branch of the Danube ("Dunărea" in Romanian). I think someone has mistaken the rightmost braid running from Seimeni to the village Dunărea for something more than just one more braid as the Danube approaches its delta. It's pretty clear if you look at this map on Google Maps.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. Jmabel | Talk 23:27, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Notifying you because pretty much everyone who contributed at all significantly before you to the current version is now globally locked, so you seemed to be the most appropriate person to notify. - Jmabel | Talk 23:27, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Bucur River

Deprod because there is evidence online that this river (creek?) exists. If you think it's not significant enough coverage, then take it to AfD. Bearian (talk) 01:08, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

Hi @Bearian:, what did you find online about this river? If the coordinates in the article are correct, it must be a very short (1-2 km) stream. Markussep ^Talk 06:34, 9 May 2026 (UTC)

I clicked on the Google links. Bearian (talk) 09:23, 9 May 2026 (UTC)

I checked the Google links: they're all about different places (a river in Nepal named Bucur, the Bârsa lui Bucur in south-central Romania) or a person named Bucur. I'll nominate it for deletion then. Markussep ^Talk 09:48, 9 May 2026 (UTC)

Administraţia Naţională Apelor Române - Cadastrul Apelor - Bucureşti

Hi, you are removing this source in many articles. Can you please point me to where I can see it to check as well? Many of these rivers are written somewhat differently in different places, I'ld like to take a look at that source. Fram (talk) 10:16, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

Sure, it is here. The main difference in spelling I see is â vs. î, the latter being more or less outphased since the 1990s, except for the beginning of words. Markussep ^Talk 10:31, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

Thanks. Seems to have been superseded by some recent project from the administration, but I can't find that online, only press releases about it, so I thought you perhaps had access to that one. Fram (talk) 10:46, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

"Sacovăț River" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Sacovăț River has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 May 15 § Sacovăț River until a consensus is reached. Duckmather (talk) 06:37, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

Listing for discussion of Template:RAchelous

Template:RAchelous has been listed for discussion, which may result in the template being merged or deleted by consensus. You are invited to comment on the proposed action at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 05:59, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bad Münster am Stein-Ebernburg (Verbandsgemeinde)

The article Bad Münster am Stein-Ebernburg (Verbandsgemeinde) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:GNG and WP:WWIN

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. Mme Maigret (talk) 18:07, 28 May 2026 (UTC)