User talk:JakecarpenterADBAPI

October 2019

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Andrew D. Bernstein has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Andrew D. Bernstein was changed by JakecarpenterADBAPI (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.938311 on 2019-10-21T19:53:29+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:53, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Hello, JakecarpenterADBAPI. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Andrew D. Bernstein, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:06, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Andrew D. Bernstein. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. -- LuK3 (Talk) 21:04, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with Special:Diff/922392346/922395249 to Andrew D. Bernstein, you may be blocked from editing. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:26, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Andrew D. Bernstein. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:30, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Andrew D. Bernstein; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page, Talk:Andrew D. Bernstein, to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. See Help:Talk pages for help about using talk pages. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:31, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 21:32, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

How not to get blocked: don't use Wikipedia for promotion, follow the guidelines for neutrality and reliable sources, respond to editors if they signal problems in your editing, don't just revert or reinstate content flagged as problematic. Drmies (talk) 21:33, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JakecarpenterADBAPI. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. ST47 (talk) 18:21, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]