Jump to content

User talk:Chicdat/Archive 9

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 5←Archive 7Archive 8Archive 9

Cookies for you!

Hey Chicdat, I recently stumbled across your user page again for the first time in a while and wanted to give you some cookies. After coming off an extended Wikibreak last year I noticed a lot of the editors that started on Wikipedia at about the same time as us in 2019-2020 seem to have gone inactive but it's good to see you're not one of them. Hope you are doing well. JayTee⛈️ 05:01, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Thanks JT. Glad to see that some of WPTC's editors are still around. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 10:35, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Draft:History of the French line of succession

Hello, Chicdat,

You didn't create this draft but it appears that your accounts did some work on it over the past two years. Since you didn't make the first edit, you would not have received a notification but this draft article will be deleted soon as a stale draft, CSD G13. If you wish to continue to work on it, you can request its restoration at WP:REFUND. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 20:14, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

That's fine, I wasn't going to work on it any more anyway. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 11:38, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 November 2024

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:03, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 November 2024

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:41, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 December 2024

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:56, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

Re: appealing ban

Oh man I didn't know you've been banned from project space for that long! Good job for wanting to still contribute after all of this time. I suggest maybe creating a few sandboxes to show the kind of articles you'd like to work on, and maybe show other projects you've done to prove your usefulness, such as the List of Atlantic tropical storms that you made. I would support appealing your ban, however. I think you could be a productive editor, for sure! ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:16, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your support and advice. I created two new sandboxes to work on, which will end up becoming tropical depression lists. I'm probably going to appeal in the next week. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 23:41, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
I think that's a good way of stepping forward. When you appeal, you should mention how you have changed, matured, grown, and how you will be as an editor moving forward. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 03:04, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
Feel free to comment at WP:AN#Chicdat ban appeal. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 13:34, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 07:15, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Thanks HouseBlaster. As with the lifted ban, I will use the right well. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 12:12, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Topic ban lifted

Chicdat, I have just closed your appeal with consensus to lift your topic ban. I would encourage you to take Lindsay's advice to heart: you are likely to have eyes on you as you fully return, so please take everything you wrote seriously and abide by it. But in the meantime, happy editing. If you need anything, I am reachable on my talk page. Best of luck, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 16:09, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

@HouseBlaster: Yes, I will take that advice to heart. Thank you. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 16:29, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
I'm sorry I've been inactive recently and was unable to comment on your request. As others said, your appeal shows a level of insight and self-reflection that was missing a few years ago. I wish you well with your continued editing. Best wishes, Cabayi (talk) 16:44, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your support Cabayi. I will try hard to keep editing well. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 17:24, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

December 20, 2024

Hello, my name is Dylan Hackworth, I have a YouTube channel, so I wanted my channel to be seen on Wikipedia. I'm sorry that I was being disrespectful on Chad Hurley's wikipedia article. I did that because more people that are on YouTube my see my YouTube channel and check it out. I thought I would get more views and subscribers. I apologize for doing all of this. 2605:59C8:409B:4E10:8CC3:7F6F:DCC3:E972 (talk) 15:12, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your apology Dylan. In the future, remember that you can't use Wikipedia to advertise your YouTube channel or anything else. Happy editing! 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 18:17, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

Jenrick Pornographer IP

Hey there,

Just to let you know, the edits that IP are making are legitimate and more than likely good-faith. Richard Desmond is noted heavily as a pornographer (see the bevy of citations on his wikipedia article) - and I think intentionally or not you might be straying into edit war territory.

Best, CR (talk) 12:20, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

So sorry. From a first look the edits look extremely defamatory. Still not sure this is very relevant to the actual sentence (about a mere donation), but I agree the edits don't look like vandalism. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 12:22, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 December 2024

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:00, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

Kevin Trudeau

It's worth noting that, even beyond the conviction for criminal contempt (which in this instance was definitely a felony), Kevin Trudeau also has earlier convictions for felony credit card fraud and larceny. 24.182.239.226 (talk) 23:12, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

So sorry about the edit summary, upon further research I saw that contempt of court is in fact a felony, but was on vacation and had no time to correct. Anyway, consensus per WP:FELON is to not label prominent BLPs as felons without a discussion on the talk page. For instance we don't describe Donald Trump as a convicted felon in the first sentence. Hope this helps. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 16:56, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

"Glacier remnant" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Glacier remnant has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 3 § Glacier remnant until a consensus is reached. Cremastra (u — c) 15:56, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Scott Wiener page

You deleted the whole California Legislative Jewish Caucus section, w/o which page fails NPOV due to huge ommission, since Wiener is a co-Chair; has passed important legislation through it, has secured $160 million through it from the State Budget, and has been in the news regarding various related activities and criticisms.

Edit CLJC section if you like or if you think it isn’t neutral, but don’t delete the whole thing!Seahumidity (talk) 21:31, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Feel free to re-add the section with a less promotional tone. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 00:27, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 January 2025

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:53, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Body mass index

Hello. Please be a bit more careful about what you accept. That article is on pending changes because of spam and you accepted an edit that replaced a legitimate external link (the US CDC) with spam. Thanks, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:39, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Oh sorry. I didn't see that. Will be more careful in future 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 00:11, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
That's all I ask. Thank you. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:53, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

A barnstar for you!
Thank you for being part of the fight against vandalism on English Wikipedia, and being one of the top five most active pending changes reviewers in the last 30 days. Your hard work is very much appreciated, please keep it up. – DreamRimmer (talk) 15:39, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
Thank you DreamRimmer – I'll keep up the good work in the coming months. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 15:40, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
I really appreciate it. Thanks so much in advance for all your great work :) – DreamRimmer (talk) 15:45, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Just saying hi!

Hey! I noticed your interest in birds. Just wanted to say hello to another bird-loving editor. (Logged out. @3OpenEyes) 74.104.160.163 (talk) 21:23, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi 3OpenEyes. I haven't edited in bird topics in a long time, but upon being reminded, you might just have made me re-enter that part of Wikipedia. Have a good day. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 21:41, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

The Signpost: 7 February 2025

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * Sent manually via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:44, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

Your request for new page reviewer right

Hi Chicdat. Thank you for your request for the new page reviewer user group. Unfortunately it has not been granted at this time. Please check back at the requests page for the administrator's reason(s) - you may be able to apply again when the requirements have been satisfied. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 19:06, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

That's fine. I will follow your advice going forward. Thank you for your input. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 19:37, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

Oligarchy

Hey Chicdat, I know this is annoying, but you are the sole defender of contested content in a Talk page discussion against 4 editors who disagree with you. You’re going to have to argue on the Talk page to gather consensus to include it, per WP:ONUS. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 23:09, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

A barnstar for you!
Thank you for being part of the fight against vandalism on English Wikipedia, and being one of the top five most active pending changes reviewers in the last 30 days. Your hard work is very much appreciated, please keep it up.– DreamRimmer (talk) 15:40, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 February 2025

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:27, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

Wikilove for the Weather Community

Hello Chicdat, WeatherWriter has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Re: Larry and 2002

Hey there Chicdat. First off, yea, Larry looks to be in pretty good shape. The met history is the one part that I think needs work before you take it to GAN. For a long-lived major hurricane, there are some things that you should discuss, such as the structural evolution of the storm (did it ever develop outflow or rainbands), and external factors in the storm's track/evolution. For example, you mention the subtropical ridge in the third paragraph, but that was probably a factor much earlier. Also, there's one too many images. The impacts can also be expanded. If there were impacts in Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands, then there were likely impacts in other Caribbean islands, or the Bahamas. One more thing, the article spends a fair bit of time talking about the stolen boat. It sounds like that could've been a fatality - when did they call off the search and rescue? Was there no more info about that? Double check for more Canada damage. The article says $20 million in damage but only gives a few concrete examples.

As for 2002, good job so far! I see you have most of the tables done. That is definitely the most annoying aspect, getting references for every fatality and damage total, and then formatting it all correctly. The only thing you're missing is a few depressions by the JMA, but I'm not sure of the best place to cite that. Maybe Gary Padgett/Steve Young? I notice some of the season sections still need citations, but I'm guessing you haven't done all of them yet.

Keep up the good work Chicdat! ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:34, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

I've made most of your suggestions for Larry, and am a little annoyed about the whole 2002 business (another editor had already done the AHS, PHS, and PTS sections, but they seem to have just copied from the lead sections of the season articles, so I'll have to completely rewrite those sections). One part I was kind of stuck on was the damage. There seem to only be two reports: the $20 million report from CATIQ, which is cited by every other source I've looked at, and the $61 million report from Aon Benfield, which no other sources seem to support. Without any knowledge of how Aon Benfield gets its numbers, I'm tempted to just write $20 million in the infobox and say it's disputed, but if there's some kind of obscure source hidden away that reveals the bigger picture, I wouldn't want to miss that. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 22:31, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
Hmm, for Larry, consider a third possibility - there's a more accurate total in Mexican pesos. It's better than saying it's disputed if there's a range in numers, but when in doubt, it's good to try and get the most official source, in this case a government source ideally. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 00:08, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
Mexican pesos? The only thing I can find with that is talking about Tropical Storm Larry in 2003. Anyway, after flip-flopping over it for a while, I've decided to just nominate it. A preliminary thanks to the guys at the NHC – I would be completely lost without the TCR. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 16:43, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
Oh wait did you mean the Larry that hit Mexico, or the Larry that hit Australia? Hurricanehink mobile (talk) 17:31, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
I meant Hurricane Larry of 2021, which hit Canada. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 17:32, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
Hahaha I probably knew that when I started the convo, sorry my bad. In that case ignore the pesos bit! Maybe try a search like [“Hurricane Larry” damage million Canada] and see if that gets anything? Hurricanehink mobile (talk) 17:35, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

So I looked into it. Most Canadian sources I'm seeing are saying $25 million in insured damage. The other sources might be considered reliable, but the $25 million is definitely more than the $20 million from CATIQ. Maybe Aon Benfield is the estimate for the overall damage, and $25 million is the insured damage? That's my best guess. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:07, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

I think it means $25 million in Canadian dollars, though. That translates to $20 million in US dollars, using the exchange rates from September 2021. I agree with the insured damage thing though, that is what I'm mostly seeing. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 19:09, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in research

Hello,

I am a researcher at the Wikimedia Foundation. We are conducting a study on how people use FlaggedRevisions and gathering feedback on users’ experiences with the tool. Our goal is to better understand how it is used and identify ways to improve it. Based on your experience, we believe you would be a valuable participant in this study and would like to invite you to take part in an interview to share your thoughts. If you would like to participate, please email me here.

Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards, TRooks-WMF (talk) 21:54, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello @Chicdat,
Just following up to see if you are interested in participating in a study on how people use FlaggedRevisions. We are looking to gather feedback on users’ experiences in order to better understand how the tool is used and identify ways to improve it. Based on your experience, we believe you would be a valuable participant in this study and would like to invite you to a 60 minute interview conducted remotely in English over Google Meet. We are happy to offer a digital thank you gift of $75 USD. If you would like to participate or have any questions, please email me here.
Kind Regards,
TRooks-WMF (talk) 17:01, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
@TRooks-WMF: No, sorry. I hope the study goes well. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 17:03, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
Got it. Thanks for getting back to me and completely understand. TRooks-WMF (talk) 17:13, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious
Four years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:27, 19 March 2025 (UTC)

Thank you! It's been a hard last couple of months for me with everything that's been going on in America lately, so I appreciate the message. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 10:39, 19 March 2025 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 March 2025

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:04, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

Request For Comment - Infobox Weather Damage Estimates

There is a new ongoing request for comment discussion, with the goal to solve the various disputes on weather-related articles (such as tornadoes or hurricanees) on how to best utilize damage estimates in the infobox. Your comments are highly-requested, as the result of this discussion will affect all weather-related articles. This notice is being sent to all editors who have recently edited weather event articles.

You can view and participate in the discussion here: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Weather#RFC - Weather Infobox Damages. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 17:23, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

Talk:Abbasid Revolution#Requested move 31 March 2025

Your comment here is an allegation of misconduct. If you wish to substantiate it, take it to ANI. An article TP is no place to make such an allegation and a WP:PERSONALATTACK without substantiation. I suggest you strike that part of your comment. Cinderella157 (talk) 11:36, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

Tendentious editing is a pattern of editing that is partisan, biased, skewed... I beg you to substantiate how you have not acted in that manner in these RMs. I see no examples of your !voting for a lowercase page name to be moved to uppercase. A personal attack is an attack against that editor personally, e.g. You are an idiot. In no way was my comment a personal attack, although I will on second thought strike the hyperbole at the end, wanting of course to keep a collaborative editing environment. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 11:42, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Cinderella157 complaining about a personal attack. Pot meet kettle? Threats to take an issue to ANI means you want to waste people's valuable online time with something that you should be able to handle with a little discussion (or just not letting words affect you so much). Randy Kryn (talk) 11:56, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
As with any P&G (actually, WP:TENDENTIOUS is an essay) it needs to be read in full and not take quotes out of their fuller context where to do so might misrepresent what is said in the fuller context, such as the above, which more fully states: Tendentious editing is a pattern of editing that is partisan, biased, skewed, and does not maintain an editorially neutral point of view. But the spirit and intent of NPOV applies to content (what is said) rather than style, which is neutral in the context of content. It continues: It may also involve repeated attempts to insert or delete content in the face of the objections of several other editors, or behavior that tends to frustrate proper editorial processes and discussions [emphasis added]. In this context frustrate refers to the process and not how editors might feel. It would be synonymous with undermine or subvert. Working within the proper editorial process and contributing cogent arguments to discussions is by definition not tendentious. I would suggest you also read Accusing others of tendentious editing and WP:WIAPA as to whether this could be seen as a personal attack. As for your question, see here. Cinderella157 (talk) 00:14, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Very well. I will drop the stick now. Although I still don't believe my comment was a personal attack and certainly didn't mean it that way, I can see how it could be perceived as such. As consensus is moving towards the threshold for capitalization being a significant majority, there's very little that I need to say before consensus is reached, so I will probably be staying out of these capitalization discussions in the future, for the most part. 🐔 talk:Chicdat|Bawk to me!]] 13:30, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
And there you go, the bludgeoning, criticism, and even veiled hints of further action if you continue your honest comments, have nudged into your good work. The result: "I will probably be staying out of these capitalization discussions in the future". You lasted longer than most. I've been at it for over 10 years, and a few editors, as you've seen and at a couple points stood up for me (thank you sincerely), give me a going over from time to time. Have learned it's part of the process. Thanks, it's been good reading your comments and seeing the icon! Randy Kryn (talk) 14:00, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Subsoil. 2600:1700:D200:F40:F510:99A2:92AD:6F2E (talk) 20:16, 5 April 2025 (UTC)

The Signpost: 9 April 2025

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:20, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Elements of capitalism

I think it would be useful to add the basic constituent elements of capitalism more systematically and comprehensively in the introduction as I did earlier, of course respecting Wikipedia standards. Thank you 79.41.35.95 (talk) 14:17, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for your message. Per our policies and guidelines, the introduction, or lead as we call it, presents an overview of the article consisting of material that's due for it. We also prefer prose to bulleted lists to explain things, especially in such a visible section as the lead. There's a very similar bulleted list in the characteristics section – feel free to refine it. If you still believe there should be such a bulleted list in the lead, please discuss on the talk page and gain consensus for the change. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 16:25, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

Nationality, not ethnicity

Hi Chicdat, you changed from the nationality to the ethnicity for Maria Branyas. However, as per MOS:ETHNICITY, this should be the nationality, not the ethnicity. Peaceray (talk) 21:18, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

And your edit has been reverted. Take a look at Carles Puigdemont – it describes him as Catalan, not Spanish. If you truly believe she should be described as Spanish, discuss on the talk page. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 22:04, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Hurricane Larry

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hurricane Larry you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Hurricanehink -- Hurricanehink (talk) 03:21, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

A barnstar for you!
Thank you for being part of the fight against vandalism on English Wikipedia, and being one of the top five most active pending changes reviewers in the last 30 days. Your hard work is very much appreciated, please keep it up. – DreamRimmer (talk) 14:14, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Hurricane Larry

The article Hurricane Larry you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Hurricane Larry for comments about the article, and Talk:Hurricane Larry/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Hurricanehink -- Hurricanehink (talk) 19:05, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 May 2025

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:16, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Hurricane Larry

Hello! Your submission of Hurricane Larry at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Mz7 (talk) 02:01, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

"Kashmir earthquake" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Kashmir earthquake has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 May 10 § Kashmir earthquake until a consensus is reached. 162 etc. (talk) 18:59, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 May 2025

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:56, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

DYK for Hurricane Larry

On 23 May 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hurricane Larry, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that an Antiguan man who escaped from custody in Canada is suspected of stealing a yacht and sailing it directly into Hurricane Larry? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hurricane Larry. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Hurricane Larry), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 12:46, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

Good job for how you dealt with the sockpuppet. I'm starting to get up to speed, only just saw the whole discussion, so I need to chime in at some point, but wanted to say, kudos to you first! ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 01:45, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
Thanks. I find the best way to deal with these guys is to not take them seriously – there's no deterrent like that one. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 13:26, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
100% The best way of dealing with a troll is not to feed it, and instead remind yourself why you are better :P ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:12, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Chicdat/Archive_9&oldid=1294289201"