Template:Admin dashboard/rfarfp
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled
Requested this permission ~2 months ago, denied because I was mostly creating auto-notable stubs. I think I have expanded the types of articles I create, including well-sourced local pages or biographical entries where I take time to source subjects that do not inherently meet a generic notability criteria. (I still do create auto-notable pages sometimes, but those no longer make up the majority of pages I create.) As a new page reviewer, I got good experience with the notability guidelines reviewing articles during the backlog drive WP:MAY25, and also participating in AfD. Thought about requesting again as I have run into a few of my own pages while reviewing pages that are in topics I contribute to/am interested in. Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 02:15, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
7-year vet of the site, multiple GANs and DYKs, 51 mainspace articles created of which 49 are live (G6 and G7 deletions for the other two). Etzedek24 (Talk) (Contribs) 20:54, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
I have been on Wikipedia for more than a decade, and I truly feel that it is one of my great passions in life. I have more than 30,000 edits, and I am credited with more than 300 articles that are not Redirects or Disambiguation pages. (I personally take credit for more than 100 of these, which did not originate as Redirect pages.) Although I continue to propose Draft pages to this day when I am not 100% confident myself about notability, I frequently go straight to the mainspace and have made a number of articles that have been significant in some form or field, with my particular focus being on film industry and electoral politics pages. Recently, I redirected a few thousand Supreme Court of the United States cases to the case volumes in which they were listed. It was a large-scale project for me, but in the end it was decided that redlinks would be better for promoting caseload knowledge, something that I agreed to and I believe will continue to service our Wikipedia community. For this reason, it might appear that I have a large number of deleted pages, but this is almost exclusively due to this particular project; I had an edit deletion rate of less than 2%, and I had not had a page that I created taken down in years, not since I was a far more novice editor. (You can read more about that SCOTUS discussion here.) I believe that being autopatrolled will continue to allow me to contribute to the Wikipedia community, and that is why I am reaching out to ask for permissions. I am happy to answer any questions or improve any articles that I have created if there is anything noticeable that needs help. Although I have long been looking to increase my permissions and role in the community, I quite frankly have always had impostor syndrome stop me from asking, but a bit of encouragement from Liz made me try. Thank you so much! PickleG13 (talk) 20:27, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
I was granted a two month trial for this. Have created 100+ articles with 10K+ edits and will continue to do so. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 23:19, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
Regular article creator and Did you know? contributor who demonstrates understanding of the notability guidelines on a number of topics. No copyright violation troubles, and spot-checks for text–source integrity do indeed check out. Note their creation Not-deer was deleted at AfD earlier this year; I'm not inclined to give this too much weight here as it seems to have been a notability edge case, and experienced participants in that discussion gave reasonable arguments both for and against deletion. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 17:08, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
I have created over 25 new articles that meet notability guidelines and follow Wikipedia standards and guideliness. I am familiar with Wikipedia’s core content policies (NPOV, V, NOR) and believe that being autopatrolled will reduce the workload on new page patrollers. Thank you in advance Lanceloth345 (talk) 12:43, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
Met this user at today's Event:NYC 400 Wiknic and Edit-A-Thon with Washington Square Park, and he lamented the delay in getting his articles patrolled despite being a prolific article writer. After reviewing their work, granting the autopatrolled right would be well-deserved. Three of their article creations from 2012 were deleted as non-notable malls. His 2014 creation of Ancient Theatre of Mytilene was deleted within days under WP:G12 which is not good but also more than a decade ago. Since then, he has written 221 live articles, 100 of which are C-class, across subjects including companies, biographies, and art pieces with adherence to our notability guidelines. ViridianPenguin🐧 (💬) 19:39, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
Been an active user for a few years, created 25+ articles with the only two deletions being mistakenly created redirects (due to a script error). Multiple GAs and FLs. I understand enwiki notability guidelines thoroughly.ULPS (talk • contribs) 22:51, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for extended confirmation |
|---|
Extended confirmed |
| There are no outstanding requests for the file mover flag. |
|---|
File mover |
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer
I am interested in helping to eliminate the backlog, particularly for articles involving Chinese, Japanese, or Korean-language sources—languages I am familiar with—that often remain stuck for long periods due to language barriers. I have experience at AFD and AFC, and while the P&G vary across Wikiprojects, I have served as an NPP on zhwiki for four years. —👑PRINCE of EREBOR📜 08:57, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
I am requesting this flag to help patrol new articles and drafts. My main focus would be reviewing quality content based on English Wikipedia and marking CSD promotional/advertisement/spam content. Also, identify copyright violations if any when discovered. Thank you. Agent 007 (talk) 09:07, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
I'm reapplying for NPR rights as my three-month trial is about to expire. I unfortunately haven't done that much patrolling during my trial as I've mostly been working in other areas, but hopefully my AfC, CSD, AfD and article creation records are enough to show that I have a sufficient understanding of policies and guidelines to be trusted with this right. If approved, I'm definitely hoping to be more active at NPP in the future to help clear the backlog. MCE89 (talk) 02:33, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I’m re-applying for NPP permission after a three-month trial. I haven’t been a super prolific reviewer (90 articles + 38 redirects) but I’ve also done more content creation, de-stubbing, and AfD which I hope also helps demonstrate my understanding of the key principles. I’ve found NPP quite rewarding and would love to continue working. Zzz plant (talk) 21:15, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Greetings, I have been an active contributor to Wikipedia for the past one year, during which I have created and edited serval articles in line with Wikipedia’s content policies and guidelines. I was previously granted New Page Reviewer permissions on a temporary basis but was unable to make full use of the tools at that time, due to other commitments. I am now available to contribute to the project, particularly in helping to reduce the backlog of unreviewed articles, Thank you for considering my request. (Primefac) 2RDD (talk) 11:30, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
I am requesting for this permission to help address the backlog of unreviewed pages and to ensure the quality of new content submitted uses encyclopedic language and that the content is accurate and neutral. I have participated in hundreds of AfDs and during that time I have developed a solid understanding of WP:GNG, RS requirements (WP:SIGCOV), and other relevant policies for reviewing pages. Gjb0zWxOb (talk) 21:23, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
I received notification that my NPP rights will expire on July 26, 2025. If you believe I have performed satisfactorily during my NPP probationary period. Please renew my position as an NPP reviewer. Thank you. Bakhtar40 (talk) 09:27, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Hello! I am applying to renew my patroller user right after a notification on my talk page. I'm not sure what I am supposed to write here, but feel free to ask me questions 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 19:59, 24 July 2025 (UTC) |
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover
While volunteering WP:UAA I find creations that should be in draftspace instead of userspace. Thus, I move using a script that requires additional steps to make a soft-redirect after moving from sandboxes/userspaces. See the log here. I kindly request this flag as it will help me to avoid leaving an unnecessary redirect as discussed at User_talk:Agent_VII#About_your_move. I also intent to use this tool if granted for WP:PMRC#3, WP:PMRC#7 when going through Special:NewPagesFeed. Thank you. Agent 007 (talk) 09:58, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
I’m requesting to be granted the page mover right because I’m active at New Page Patrol. With this, I'll be able to move these articles without leaving a redirect would save somebody else the trouble of deleting these tagged redirects. I believe this right will be benefit for me to contribute the project (I already have it at my native wiki). If you have any questions, please let me know. Thanks in advance. Hasan (talk) 12:54, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
I have been occasionally closing discussions found at WP:RM and this often results in me making requests to WP:RM/TR. All of my requests at WP:RM/TR have gone smoothly, bar two, which I learnt from and are now more cautious, especially if there are a lot pages involved in the discussion. Additionally I do an occasional bit of WP:NPP, including moving pages to draft (see my Draftify log). If granted the right I will primarily use it for round-robin moves and supressing redirects when moving articles to draft (WP:PMRC#4 and WP:PMRC#6) in order to reduce work for other editors. Full-disclosure: I had an edit warring block three and a half months ago which was lifted, by the imposing admin, an hour after it was imposed. See Special:Permalink/1284178028#April 2025. I allowed myself to get sucked into edit warring when I should have taken the editor (now banned and who I have helped in identifying sock puppets of, refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/WikiAdvisor) to a noticeboard. TarnishedPathtalk 15:48, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer
Requesting access to assist with the backlog in helping to ensure pending edits meet the criteria of the Wikipedia policies & guidelines. Eulersidentity (talk) 10:13, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I'd like to request PCR rights as I've been very active in creating and substantially improving My Little Pony and mathematics articles over the last few months. I'm very familiar with the content and vandalism policies and I'd love to be able to do my part to help Wikipedia stay free of inappropriate edits—I've already been doing this for articles that are within my watchlist. Thank you for your consideration! GregariousMadness (talk to me!) 02:34, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
I’m requesting for the pending changes reviewer rights to help review pending changes. Allblessed (talk) 08:20, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Desire to possess the ability to approve or reject protected article edits, having reviewed and become familiar with Wikipedia copyright and vandalism rules and guidelines; and having demonstrated a responsible record of stewardship of articles and related media over the course of this account. Thank you for your consideration and any feedback on additional qualifying criteria. OceanLoop (talk) 00:06, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
I am requesting the pending changes reviewer right because I would like to ensure that articles with pending changes are regularly reviewed. I have substantial experience with reviewing recent changes and administrative processes regarding vandalism and page protection and am an active editor. Thanks! Cyrobyte (talk) 01:37, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback
I've had some experience with reverting vandalism and am confident with Special:RecentChanges and Wikipedia's internal policies on vandalism. I'm requesting rollback rights to be able to fix obvious vandalism more effectively. Nixleovel (He/They) (Talk • Contribs) 06:20, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I need the rollback rights to help revert vandalism and bad faith edits. Allblessed (talk) 08:21, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Fighting against vandalism in my part time. Ḅ̵̼̝̭͔͆̿́͌̚l̷͖̯͚͕̭̑͑̀͑͘a̵͍̘̥̟̪͗̈́̈́͒͠â̷̮͎̲̪̥̿̐͗͝d̵̰͓̠̘̫͒̎̽͊̉a̷̛̬̜̲̲͙̅͛͝͠ (talk) 20:03, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
I have been reverting and warning vandals for a while now. As evidence for that you can see I have created ~220 user talk pages. I would find rollback particularly useful for persistent/spammy vandals. Thank you. Sophocrat (talk) 21:40, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
As a member of Wikipedia:WikiProject Wildfire, I frequently patrol pages about wildfires, and undo vandalism. I frequently check Special:RecentChanges for vandalism. I have been active on Wikipedia for more the two years and have made plenty of reverts. I have made 283 edits in the past 6 days alone. CostalCal (talk) 09:30, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for template editor |
|---|
Template editor
Increasing number of edits into the template space after being an article contributor for years. Running across more protected templates, such as Infobox gymnast, for which I'd need access. Already have much experience editing and creating templates, as well as sandbox to production edits. GauchoDude (talk) 20:46, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
@Primefac: (permalink) Re-applying for the permission, expiring on 24 July 2025. (edit requests) — Est. 2021 (talk · contribs) 20:22, 19 July 2025 (UTC) |
