Template:Admin dashboard/rfarfp
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled
Requested this permission ~2 months ago, denied because I was mostly creating auto-notable stubs. I think I have expanded the types of articles I create, including well-sourced local pages or biographical entries where I take time to source subjects that do not inherently meet a generic notability criteria. (I still do create auto-notable pages sometimes, but those no longer make up the majority of pages I create.) As a new page reviewer, I got good experience with the notability guidelines reviewing articles during the backlog drive WP:MAY25, and also participating in AfD. Thought about requesting again as I have run into a few of my own pages while reviewing pages that are in topics I contribute to/am interested in. Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 02:15, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
I have been on Wikipedia for more than a decade, and I truly feel that it is one of my great passions in life. I have more than 30,000 edits, and I am credited with more than 300 articles that are not Redirects or Disambiguation pages. (I personally take credit for more than 100 of these, which did not originate as Redirect pages.) Although I continue to propose Draft pages to this day when I am not 100% confident myself about notability, I frequently go straight to the mainspace and have made a number of articles that have been significant in some form or field, with my particular focus being on film industry and electoral politics pages. Recently, I redirected a few thousand Supreme Court of the United States cases to the case volumes in which they were listed. It was a large-scale project for me, but in the end it was decided that redlinks would be better for promoting caseload knowledge, something that I agreed to and I believe will continue to service our Wikipedia community. For this reason, it might appear that I have a large number of deleted pages, but this is almost exclusively due to this particular project; I had an edit deletion rate of less than 2%, and I had not had a page that I created taken down in years, not since I was a far more novice editor. (You can read more about that SCOTUS discussion here.) I believe that being autopatrolled will continue to allow me to contribute to the Wikipedia community, and that is why I am reaching out to ask for permissions. I am happy to answer any questions or improve any articles that I have created if there is anything noticeable that needs help. Although I have long been looking to increase my permissions and role in the community, I quite frankly have always had impostor syndrome stop me from asking, but a bit of encouragement from Liz made me try. Thank you so much! PickleG13 (talk) 20:27, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
I was granted a two month trial for this. Have created 100+ articles with 10K+ edits and will continue to do so. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 23:19, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
I have created over 25 new articles that meet notability guidelines and follow Wikipedia standards and guideliness. I am familiar with Wikipedia’s core content policies (NPOV, V, NOR) and believe that being autopatrolled will reduce the workload on new page patrollers, my ittention for contributing to Wikipedia, i have mention to my talk page, also to be noted i am reviewer and patroller at Albanian wiki with all articles, neither deleted, and noone of edits are reverted. Thank you in advance. Lanceloth345 (talk) 12:43, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
Been an active user for a few years, created 25+ articles with the only two deletions being mistakenly created redirects (due to a script error). Multiple GAs and FLs. I understand enwiki notability guidelines thoroughly.ULPS (talk • contribs) 22:51, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
As part of the Women in Red project, I create pages about women by translating, adapting, and improving articles from the Spanish Wikipedia. Onatic (talk) 21:00, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Slightly below the recommended 25 creations before nomination, but this editor has a track record of writing quality content that I don't believe NPP needs to continue reviewing. No issues found spot-checking their recent creations. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 21:26, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Demonstrates understanding of the notability guidelines on a variety of subjects. The articles are fairly well-written and -formatted; a few are also now GAs. I marked a couple of her newer creations as reviewed and found no major issues. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 21:31, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
I have created more than 25 non redirect articles within the past few weeks and 53 non redirects overall. The two mainspace ones that have been deleted were by my own request, thanks to a slip of the "Publish changes" button. Aside from those, all have been approved by the adminteam. I would greatly be thankful to receive this permission. Luxtaythe2nd (Talk to me...) 17:56, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
I have created over 650 new articles and hope to continue contributing to Wikipedia and knowledge sharing. TinaLees-Jones (talk) 03:38, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to request the autopatrolled user right. I have created around 30 well-sourced, policy-compliant articles on the English Wikipedia. In addition to my contributions here, I am an administrator (sysop) on the Persian Wikipedia (fa.wikipedia), where I have been active for many years, focusing on content creation, vandalism control, and community support. Granting this right would help reduce the workload of new page patrollers, as my article creations usually meet Wikipedia’s quality standards. Thank you very much for your time and consideration. Best regards, Shahnamk (talk) 19:08, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to request the autopatrolled user right. I’ve created several articles, many of which are currently live and meet Wikipedia’s guidelines on notability and reliable sourcing. I’m familiar with the key content policies such as WP:N, WP:V, WP:RS, and WP:NPOV, and consistently apply them when creating or editing articles. I understand that this permission is intended to reduce the workload of new page reviewers by marking trusted users’ pages as reviewed automatically, and I believe my contributions demonstrate the consistency and policy alignment expected for this role. I have not received any blocks or serious warnings, and I’m committed to continuing constructive, policy-compliant editing. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sweetabena (talk) 23:39, 28 July 2025 (UTC) |
| There are no outstanding requests for the file mover flag. |
|---|
File mover |
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer
I'm reapplying for NPR rights as my three-month trial is about to expire. I unfortunately haven't done that much patrolling during my trial as I've mostly been working in other areas, but hopefully my AfC, CSD, AfD and article creation records are enough to show that I have a sufficient understanding of policies and guidelines to be trusted with this right. If approved, I'm definitely hoping to be more active at NPP in the future to help clear the backlog. MCE89 (talk) 02:33, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I’m re-applying for NPP permission after a three-month trial. I haven’t been a super prolific reviewer (90 articles + 38 redirects) but I’ve also done more content creation, de-stubbing, and AfD which I hope also helps demonstrate my understanding of the key principles. I’ve found NPP quite rewarding and would love to continue working. Zzz plant (talk) 21:15, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
I am requesting for this permission to help address the backlog of unreviewed pages and to ensure the quality of new content submitted uses encyclopedic language and that the content is accurate and neutral. I have participated in hundreds of AfDs and during that time I have developed a solid understanding of WP:GNG, RS requirements (WP:SIGCOV), and other relevant policies for reviewing pages. Gjb0zWxOb (talk) 21:23, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
I received notification that my NPP rights will expire on July 26, 2025. If you believe I have performed satisfactorily during my NPP probationary period. Please renew my position as an NPP reviewer. Thank you. Bakhtar40 (talk) 09:27, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Hello! I am applying to renew my patroller user right after a notification on my talk page. I'm not sure what I am supposed to write here, but feel free to ask me questions 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 19:59, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to request New Page Reviewer rights to support efforts in curating new content and reducing the existing backlog. Over the course of my contributions, I’ve developed a strong understanding of key content policies, including WP:N, WP:RS, and WP:BLP, and I’ve actively participated in AfD discussions and improved multiple articles. My goal is to ensure that newly created pages meet Wikipedia's standards for neutrality, sourcing, and notability. As an AfD participant, I’ve gained experience in identifying promotional or non-notable content and would like to expand my activity towards this area. Thank you for your time and consideration. Lorraine Crane (talk) 04:50, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
I was granted patroller rights on 30 April for the May backlog drive. I would like either an extension or permanent rights as I have continued reviewing at both NPP and AfC. ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · email · global) 06:04, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
I specialize in reviewing articles with Kannada, English and Hindi-language sources, which often face prolonged backlogs due to limited reviewer availability. My fluency in these languages enables me to: • Verify sources that others might skip due to language barriers • Improve coverage of South Asian topics • Guide new editors working with regional references Having participated extensively in AFD and AFC processes, I understand enwiki's notability standards. I'm particularly motivated to clear the bottleneck for Indic-language articles that deserve timely review. Editorrking (talk) 13:15, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
I'm interested in helping reduce the backlog, especially for articles under Wikipedia Tambayan, with a focus on topics in the Music Task Force. Some pages tend to sit unreviewed for quite a while, based on what i've seen, and it would be great to help move them along. There's also I have experience in AfD discussions, particularly when it comes to looking into suspicious or possibly non-notable articles. Thank you! AdobongPogi masarap 🍛 09:45, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
I've been involved in WP for a long time now, with a very clean record. I've used AWB and other tools previously, and also previously patrolled new pages. I'm starting to want to combine more administrative/cleanup tasks with those of my usual article creation, and have noticed the backlog of new pages. I've got a strong grasp of WP policies, the AFD, CSD, etc processes, and talkpage rating, categorising, etc, and will be able to put these to good use reviewing and improving new articles. SɱαɾƚყPαɳƚʂ22 (Ⓣⓐⓛⓚ) 00:38, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Hello! I've been an editor in good standing ever since first creating my account over 18 years ago. My activity has fluctuated with my ability to find time to edit, but after many years of editing, participating in AfD, and contributing to various WikiProjects, I feel like I've gotten to a pretty good place when it comes to my knowledge of notability and sourcing policies. I'd love to take this step to begin clearing the backlog and ensuring new pages maintain high standards! nf utvol (talk) 00:55, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I am requesting the New Page Reviewer user right. I have created approximately 30 well-sourced articles on the English Wikipedia and am familiar with notability guidelines and general content policies. I also serve as an administrator (sysop) on the Persian Wikipedia (fa.wikipedia), where I have extensive experience in article review, patrolling, and enforcing content policies. I would like to help maintain article quality on the English Wikipedia by reviewing new pages, identifying issues, and supporting other reviewers. Thank you for your consideration. Best regards, Shahnamk (talk) 19:09, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover
Mainly requesting so I can bold move pages to multi-revision redirects, but I may cautiously move into closing RMs one day. I think I have decent experience from participating at WP:RMC and understand the guidelines reasonably well. Thanks, Kowal2701 (talk) 10:58, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
This right would be helpful for when I close RMs so that I don't need to request the move be performed at WP:RM/TR afterwards, as well as potentially helping out with moves there myself. Tenshi! (Talk page) 23:15, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
I've been involved in a few page swaps recently following move requests - however, I've been unable to complete them due to the default permissions leaving behind redirects, which is undesirable when swapping pages. I'd like to be able to carry out such moves without having to request technical support. Danners430 tweaks made 17:00, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer
I often patrol the recent changes page and would like to help out more by reviewing changes. I am relatively new to Wikipedia compared to others; however, I have edited many times over the years before I made this account. I have also long been a fan of Wikipedia and would like to help out further. I believe I fit the criteria to get this permission. Otherwise, I understand and would appreciate feedback. Pencilceaser123 (talk) 04:47, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
I'm requesting pending changes reviewer rights and I'm really like to help keep articles under pending changes protection well maintained. I've seen some pages get vandalize or change without explanation, and I'd like to help by reviewing those edits and making sure only useful ones go through. AdobongPogi masarap 🍛 09:25, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights: I would like to help on Wikipedia to combat vandalism and I am an avid editor as well. Theeverywhereperson (talk here) 18:17, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback
Hello, I'd like to get rollback rights to fight vandalism more effectively. While I don't patrol recent pages often, I do patrol new pages and short pages, where I frequently undo obvious vandalism (as seen in [2]). I'd like rollback to more easily undo edits, as well as access huggle and other tools. Yelps ᘛ⁐̤ᕐᐷ critique me 08:24, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I want to receive a rollback right because there are a lot of editors who add informations but not citing sources. Usually, they do not add unsourced informations at once, but they add them by multiple times. There are also edits violating MoS or Wikipedia policies. And I have struggled with reverting all of them one by one, so I decided to request a right for rollback. Thank you. Camilasdandelions (talk!) 03:56, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
|
| There are no outstanding requests for template editor. |
|---|
Template editor |