Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Slovakia

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Slovakia. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Slovakia|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Slovakia. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

This list is also part of the larger list of deletion debates related to Europe.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:

WikiProject Deletion sorting/Slovakia/archive

Purge page cache

watch

See also: Wikipedia:Eastern European Wikipedians' notice board

Scan for Slovakia related AfDs

Scan for Slovakia related Prods
Scan for Slovakia related TfDs

Slovakia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 00:05, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lukáš Kožička

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Kožička played a total of 125 minutes at professional level before disappearing in 2015. Regarding secondary sources, my searches showed nothing better than passing mentions in squad list. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 15:53, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Slovakia. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 15:53, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Hasn't played enough to have enough written about him. Fails WP:GNG – RossEvans19 (talk) 18:44, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 20:58, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. Giant Snowman 21:00, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. All votes are for keep. (non-admin closure) it's lio! | talk | work 08:06, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vierka Berkyová

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of significance for this Z-list celeb. References are profiles and interviews. Fails WP:SIGCOV scope_creep^Talk 20:01, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Women, Television, and Slovakia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:04, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Both SME and Život references look decent, the former of which has more independent analysis beyond the interview. Searching for "Vierka Berkyová site:.sk" on Google may show more secondary results. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 11:13, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Život has no byline, it is a PR announcement of the new album which never appeared and the SME stated is from the editorial office, meaning its paid for PR as well. Those two are non-rs sources. You don't know how to evaluate references. scope_creep^Talk 16:09, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making hostile personal comments. Thank you. (I am not sure I agree with your appraisal of the sources (Korzár being what it is, not great but certainly not plainly "non-rs"; and the same goes for Život and Plus jeden deň (same group) in general and in that particular case) but even if it is correct, that's not my point). -Mushy Yank. 19:08, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to SuperStar_Search_Slovakia#Series overview: (or to SuperStar_Search_Slovakia season_3. Listed there, obviously (as the winner), as I suggested when I deProded the page and added sources (same nominator) if the sources are judged insufficient for a standalone article. -Mushy Yank. 18:57, 12 February 2025 (UTC) Changing to Keep in view of the sources presented by @Newklear007:. Thanks. [edited, -Mushy Yank. 16:35, 18 February 2025 (UTC)][reply]

Your the editor that removed the prod and put these trash references in. You have no clue how to evaluate a proper reference either. I intend to check every article you have created in the next several weeks. scope_creep^Talk 20:01, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Be my guest. But, again, do refrain from making (very) hostile (and rude) personal comments. -Mushy Yank. 20:07, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Off topic but you can sign your comments with ~~~~ All Tomorrows No Yesterdays (Ughhh.... What did I do wrong this time?) 13:59, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It seems you have been an editor for 6 years now so I am a bit shocked that you didn't know this (that's an assumption though). Please remember to sign your comments properly. All Tomorrows No Yesterdays (Ughhh.... What did I do wrong this time?) 14:10, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @All Tomorrows No Yesterdays:, not sure what you meant: who did you assume didn't sign their comments properly? Every single comment on this page was. Including mine. -Mushy Yank. 16:28, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Mushy Yank: – I would be fine for redirect. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 12:23, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Clariniie: Actually, I am now a Keep myself too given the new sources presented. Thanks!-Mushy Yank. 16:35, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There is sufficient converge in secondary sources. Personal attacks are not an argument for page deletion. Newklear007 (talk) 12:05, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Newklear007: What secondary sources, exactly? If there is no secondary sources that satisfies the WP:BLP and WP:BIO, then in a month or two it will going to Afd. So post up the secondary sources. I see you have only done 15 Afd's. It is common best practice, consensus based practice to post the evidence on here, so they can be reviewed, i.e. WP:SECONDARY sources that satisfy WP:BIO. Then I can close it. scope_creep^Talk 14:25, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Scope creep Here you go [1][2][3][4][5] Newklear007 (talk) 15:04, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Newklear007: Thanks for posting that. It looks like there is some more stuff there that wasn't there before. I'll take a look, shortly. scope_creep^Talk 15:09, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment These references arent particularly decent either. What is here is a singer who took part in the Slovensko hľadá SuperStar, at the end was dropped by her label and never made an album. Most of the coverage is instrumental to that event and there is nothing else. She fails WP:NSINGER and WP:SIGCOV. It all z-list stuff and completely non-notable. scope_creep^Talk 19:24, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Please note that uncivilized behaviour, personal attacks and singling out a specific editor to follow around are all serious policy violations.

If you disagree with someone's source assessment, criticize the assessment, not the editor who presented it.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 08:07, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Hoping for some more views about the sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 23:42, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Sufficient coverage with secondary sources. Agreeing with what Newlear007 said. ^Wiinter_U 08:29, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I'm not sure what's supposed to be wrong with the references Newklear provided. The first admittedly does not have a byline, but others in the set do, and the coverage is significant. -- asilvering (talk) 01:42, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. ✗plicit 00:37, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS Link

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources, making it fail to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Loewstisch (talk) 09:37, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Loewstisch (talk) 09:37, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Television, Czech Republic, Luxembourg, and Slovakia. ZyphorianNexus ^Talk 10:45, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Did OP look? Loads of local-language coverage as you might expect, such as Czech Radio [6] [7], Mafra [8] [9], Czech Television [10] [11]. C 679 14:08, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 10:01, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – It would help if someone with the knowledge of Czech language could analysis whether the sources provided by Cloudz679 count toward significant coverage or not. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 12:24, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 07:59, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Slovakia

Slovakia

Lukáš Kožička

Vierka Berkyová

CS Link

Others

Categories

Deletion reviews

Miscellaneous

Proposed deletions

Redirects

Templates

See also