Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Fraternities and sororities

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Fraternities and sororities. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Fraternities and sororities|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Fraternities and sororities. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:

WikiProject Deletion sorting/Fraternities and sororities/archive

Purge page cache

watch

See also: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Fraternities and Sororities

Fraternities and sororities

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to Mary Perkins. Sorry, IP editor but I see a consensus to Merge. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:16, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Modern Muse

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable on its own, merge with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Perkins Rubymza (talk) 23:14, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, Arts, Organizations, Business, Companies, Education, Fraternities and sororities, Schools, Science, Engineering, Mathematics, Technology, Websites, and United Kingdom. Rubymza (talk) 23:14, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge seems like a good choice. She's perhaps more notable. Oaktree b (talk) 14:42, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Blatantly WP:PROMOtional, and the original creator was long ago blocked for WP:UPE. Opposed to the merge for the same basic reason, and also because a biography on someone who donated money to help found the organization and doesn't otherwise have any involvement with it doesn't warrant inclusion of any information about the organization itself in her article. 35.139.154.158 (talk) 17:10, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge as above as per ATD, none of the sourcing meets GNG/NCORP criteria for establishing notability. HighKing⁺⁺ 20:51, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This is not a valid ATD. The article was created as probable UPE, is highly promotional in nature, there's no real usable sourcing, and the connection to the proposed target is extremely tenuous. 35.139.154.158 (talk) 21:28, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.