Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SignPlot

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by WhyWeAll (talk | contribs) at 23:18, 1 July 2023. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
SignPlot (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Google News only has [1] which is limited circulation, WP:AUD. There are COI tags on the article but I am not going to evaluate that allegation here. Rschen7754 20:48, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep After a quick google session, I managed to find a few secondary sources - I consider these RS, but they are narrow in scope to industry publication sand may not meet WP:SIGCOV. Ive worked them into the article for now. Cannot comment on COI tags, although the program's designer was also credited as a contributor to the NY art expo. Dfadden (talk) 23:59, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:09, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Leave. I agree with the previous speaker. In any case, the article does not look like a commercial. In such cases, let's think about the sensations of a Googler. he will find the wiki article and read the information about the item that we have collected for him here. Or will not read if the article is deleted. Why do you always want to delete everything?