Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is a noticeboard for things particularly relevant to Wikipedians working on articles on India.
Article alerts for WikiProject India

Did you know

Articles for deletion

(99 more...)

Proposed deletions

(7 more...)

Categories for discussion

Redirects for discussion

(3 more...)

Files for discussion

Featured article candidates

Good article nominees

Good article reassessments

Requests for comments

Peer reviews

Requested moves

(34 more...)

Articles to be merged

(31 more...)

Articles to be split

(13 more...)

Articles for creation

(96 more...)

This table is updated daily by a bot

Wikipedia Meetups edit
Upcoming
none
Recent
Outside India
Past meetups

Unsourced for 15 years, tagged as not notable for 5 months, and little more than an attractive nuisance for edit-warring. Bearian (talk) 16:12, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This might be the first Indian article I've deprodded. Please add reliable sources. Bearian (talk) 18:55, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Murali Kartik

[edit]

Murali Kartik has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 01:04, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern: Lohara dynasty article lacks Indian scholarly input

[edit]

Hello WikiProject India,

I recently read the Wikipedia article on the Lohara dynasty, and I wanted to raise a few concerns that I think might interest this project.

The article heavily focuses on the more scandalous aspects of the dynasty—like incest, fratricide, and internal power struggles. While I understand that much of it comes from Kalhana’s 'Rajatarangini,' the article gives almost no attention to other aspects of the dynasty, such as its administration, culture, or historical significance in Kashmir’s medieval period.

More importantly, the article seems to rely almost entirely on older or colonial-era sources (e.g., Aurel Stein), with little or no representation from modern Indian scholars or academic research. This seems like a serious gap, especially given the importance of including diverse perspectives, particularly from regional or Indian historiography.

I’m not a historian myself—just a concerned reader—but I believe this article could really benefit from the attention of editors within this project. If any of you could:

  • Suggest better sources from Indian historians,
  • Help revise or balance the current content,
  • Or even flag the article for improvement or review,

...that would be immensely helpful.

Thank you for your time, and I really appreciate all the work this project does to improve India-related content on Wikipedia. Dunkan4051 (talk) 09:28, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Dev (Bengali actor)#Requested move 10 May 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 17:21, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RFC on the reliability of Rediff.com

[edit]

There is a RFC on the reliability bog Rediff.com on RSN. Any interested editor should see WP:RSN#RfC: Rediff.com -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 19:59, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I request anyone to maintain the page in terms of infobox and information about India. Someone is removing the Indian initiatives in the infobox for no reason despite the fact that India is already in top 10 of AI Arms race. I have no problem of having other countries in the infobox but protecting Indian interest is important. Well I could do that, but I have exams and need to study. Please anyone check the page regularly. 2405:201:900C:D17F:FC6D:6BD1:307D:7CBE (talk) 07:18, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]