Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics
![]() | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
![]() | Noticeboard for India-related topics was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 14 November 2011. |
![]() | Noticeboard for India-related topics was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 26 December 2007. |
![]() | This page has been mentioned by multiple media organizations:
|
Article alerts for WikiProject India |
Did you know
Articles for deletion
Proposed deletions
Categories for discussion
Redirects for discussion
Files for discussion
Featured article candidates
Good article nominees
Good article reassessments
Requests for comments
Peer reviews
Requested moves
Articles to be merged
Articles to be split
Articles for creation
|
This table is updated daily by a bot |
| ||||||||||||
|
Unsourced for 15 years, tagged as not notable for 5 months, and little more than an attractive nuisance for edit-warring. Bearian (talk) 16:12, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
This might be the first Indian article I've deprodded. Please add reliable sources. Bearian (talk) 18:55, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Murali Kartik
[edit]Murali Kartik has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 01:04, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
Concern: Lohara dynasty article lacks Indian scholarly input
[edit]Hello WikiProject India,
I recently read the Wikipedia article on the Lohara dynasty, and I wanted to raise a few concerns that I think might interest this project.
The article heavily focuses on the more scandalous aspects of the dynasty—like incest, fratricide, and internal power struggles. While I understand that much of it comes from Kalhana’s 'Rajatarangini,' the article gives almost no attention to other aspects of the dynasty, such as its administration, culture, or historical significance in Kashmir’s medieval period.
More importantly, the article seems to rely almost entirely on older or colonial-era sources (e.g., Aurel Stein), with little or no representation from modern Indian scholars or academic research. This seems like a serious gap, especially given the importance of including diverse perspectives, particularly from regional or Indian historiography.
I’m not a historian myself—just a concerned reader—but I believe this article could really benefit from the attention of editors within this project. If any of you could:
- Suggest better sources from Indian historians,
- Help revise or balance the current content,
- Or even flag the article for improvement or review,
...that would be immensely helpful.
Thank you for your time, and I really appreciate all the work this project does to improve India-related content on Wikipedia. Dunkan4051 (talk) 09:28, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Dev (Bengali actor)#Requested move 10 May 2025
[edit]
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Dev (Bengali actor)#Requested move 10 May 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 17:21, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
RFC on the reliability of Rediff.com
[edit]There is a RFC on the reliability bog Rediff.com on RSN. Any interested editor should see WP:RSN#RfC: Rediff.com -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 19:59, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
I request anyone to maintain the page in terms of infobox and information about India. Someone is removing the Indian initiatives in the infobox for no reason despite the fact that India is already in top 10 of AI Arms race. I have no problem of having other countries in the infobox but protecting Indian interest is important. Well I could do that, but I have exams and need to study. Please anyone check the page regularly. 2405:201:900C:D17F:FC6D:6BD1:307D:7CBE (talk) 07:18, 20 May 2025 (UTC)