Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention

Usernames for administrator attention

This page is intended for reports of usernames that are blatant and serious violations of the username policy requiring an immediate block. Reports will be assessed in accordance with the username policy, the UAA instructions, and the following bullet points. Please ensure you are familiar with the assessment criteria before making a report.

1. Except in the instance of an egregious name violation, please do not report accounts with no edits or those who have not edited in the preceding 2 weeks.
2. Real names are permitted, except when the editor implies they are someone other than themselves, such as impersonating a notable living person.
3. Promotional names require evidence to be blocked. Do not report a username merely because it "appears" promotional.
4. For libellous usernames or usernames that contain another editor's nonpublic personal information, please contact an oversighter and do not report it here.
5. Discuss less-serious violations with the user on their talk page so that they can rename or abandon their account in good faith. Templates such as {{Uw-username}} or {{Uw-coi-username}} may be used. If, after discussion with a user, the problem still seems unresolved, a username request for comment may be in order.
6. Do not leave a username warning on a user's talk page and also immediately report them here. Do one or the other, and not both simultaneously.
7. Patrollers are asked to remove reports that have been declined, are bot-reported false positives or are otherwise non-blatant or stale reports.

You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Note: Patrollers may wish to monitor usernames flagged by filters 54, 148 and 149; private filters 102, 354, 499, 579; and this recent changes filter tag.

This page was last updated at 09:22 on 5 August 2025 (UTC). if it is out of date.

Bot-reported

• Quinns Football Club (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "role account?" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 08:10, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

   Note on file Usernames containing this string are often role accounts - check if this is the case -- DQB (owner / report) 08:10, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

• Imheretofixdavidcorenswetspage (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 23:00, 2 August 2025 (UTC)

  This username matched "long username without spaces" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 23:00, 2 August 2025 (UTC)

  Username implies that they are a SPA. All the Best -- Chuck ^Talk 05:36, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

  Do you know who they might be an SPA of? Is there an existing SPA case that this username could be added to? It Is Me Here (talk) 18:00, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

• A Simple Life (Season Finale) next at 12am (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "40chars" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 06:30, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

   Note on file Username exceeds 40 characters. -- DQB (owner / report) 06:30, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

• Sarapeterson2 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 08:20, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

  This username matched "rape" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 08:20, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

• Adelaide Hills Council (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "role account?" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 08:30, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

   Note on file Usernames containing this string are often role accounts - check if this is the case -- DQB (owner / report) 08:30, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

User-reported

• Sfsharmuisgood (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Promotional username and conflict of interest editor of the St. Francis School, Harmu page.

  It looks a child or vandal. Secretlondon (talk) 19:39, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

• Ecpdraft (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See userpage. Tenshi! (Talk page) 20:28, 4 August 2025 (UTC)
• MarketingLadyatSLW (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Johnj1995 (talk) 23:35, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

  This looks like an attempt at a "Mark at WidgetsUSA"-style username (which is permitted), rather than a role account. jlwoodwa (talk) 03:25, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

  But there is probably more than one lady in marketing there. Secretlondon (talk) 05:22, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

  And at a large enough company, there's likely to be multiple Marks. The part of the username that refers to an individual doesn't need to be a unique identifier, it just needs to not consist entirely of posts, positions, roles, or job titles. "Lady" is not a job title at any company I'm aware of. jlwoodwa (talk) 06:03, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

• If what Israel is doing to Gaza isn't a genocide, then nothing is considered genocide (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as an offensive username. TLJ7863 (talk) 05:15, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

  Offensive? Ehhhh... chances of them being disruptive are high, though. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contributions)} 05:19, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

  If nothing else, it's a violation of the ECR on WP:PIA. jlwoodwa (talk) 05:48, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

  Whether that's offensive or not probably depends on your views on the said conflict, but I'd say that's pretty provocative and clearly intended to stir **** up, which is hardly conducive to collaborative working. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:06, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

  For me, this username is certainly disruptive, though I'm not certain about it being offensive. Depending on the edits, I'd be inclined to either soft-block or hard-block, but I don't consider this username to be so disruptive as to warrant a block without edits... Salvio ^giuliano 07:30, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

• SEINō Analytics (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Soft block for now. Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 08:48, 5 August 2025 (UTC)