Wikipedia:Simple talk

Simple talk
	This is the place to ask any questions you have about the Simple English Wikipedia. Any general discussions or anything of community interest is also appropriate here. You might also find an answer on Wikipedia:Useful, a listing of helpful pages. You may reply to any section below by clicking the "change this page" link, or add a new discussion section to this page. Please sign and date your post (by typing ~~~~). Please add new topics to the bottom of this page. Please note that old discussions on this page are archived periodically. If you do not find a discussion here, please look in the archives. Note that you should not change the archives, so if something that has been archived needs discussing, please start a new discussion on this page. Some of the language used on this page can be complicated. This is because it is used by editors to talk to one another, so sometimes we forget. Please leave us a note if you are finding what we are saying too hard to read.
Are you in the right place? See WP:AN to speak to an administrator. See WP:RFCU for CheckUser requests. See WP:OS for oversight. See WP:RFRB to request the rollback feature (which administrators can grant). See WP:VIP to report vandalism. Add this page to your list of watched pages —    change

Feminism and Folklore 2026 starts soon

Please help translate to your language

Invitation to Organize Feminism and Folklore 2026

Dear Wiki Community,

We are pleased to invite Wikimedia communities, affiliates, and independent contributors to organize the Feminism and Folklore 2026 writing competition on your local Wikipedia.

The international campaign will run from 1 February to 31 March 2026 and aims to improve coverage of feminism, women’s histories, gender-related topics, and folk culture across Wikipedia projects.

About the Campaign

Feminism and Folklore is a global writing initiative that complements the Wiki Loves Folklore photography competition. While Wiki Loves Folklore focuses on visual documentation, this writing campaign addresses the gender gap on Wikipedia by improving encyclopedic content related to folk culture and marginalized voices.

What Can Participants Write About?

Communities can contribute by creating, expanding, or translating articles related to:

• Folk festivals, rituals, and celebrations
• Folk dances, music, and traditional performances
• Women and queer figures in folklore
• Women in mythology and oral traditions
• Women warriors, witches, and witch-hunting narratives
• Fairy tales, folk stories, and legends
• Folk games, sports, and cultural practices

Participants may work from curated article lists or generate new article suggestions using campaign tools.

How to Sign Up as an Organizer

Organizers are requested to complete the following steps to register their community:

1. Create a local project page on your wiki (see sample)
2. Set up the campaign using the CampWiz tool
3. Prepare a local article list and clearly mention:
   • Campaign timeline
   • Local and international prizes
4. Request a site notice from local administrators (see sample)
5. Add your local project page and CampWiz link to the Meta project page

Campaign Tools

The Wiki Loves Folklore Tech Team has introduced tools to support organizers and participants:

• Article List Generator by Topic – Helps identify articles available on English Wikipedia but missing in your local language Wikipedia. The tool allows customized filters and provides downloadable article lists in CSV and wikitable formats.
• CampWiz – Enables communities to manage writing campaigns effectively, including jury-based evaluation. This will be the third year CampWiz is officially used for Feminism and Folklore.

Both tools are now available for use in the campaign. Click here to access the tools

Learn More & Get Support

For detailed information about rules, timelines, and prizes, please visit the Feminism and Folklore 2026 project page.

If you have any questions or need assistance, feel free to reach out via:

• Meta talk page
• Email us using details on the contact page.

Join Us

We look forward to your collaboration and coordination in making Feminism and Folklore 2026 a meaningful and impactful campaign for closing gender gaps and enriching folk culture content on Wikipedia.

Thank you and best wishes,

Feminism and Folklore 2026 International Team

---

Stay connected:  

Trans shooter

I've started a discussion at Talk:Trans shooter to determine what the best title is for this article. Please share your thoughts on the best title for it there. CountryANDWestern (talk) 22:23, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

Added something to the talk page. Currently article suffers from different problems: we don't know how common the different terms or accusations actually are. We also don't have any examples how the terms are actually used. If this does not improve, we might end up deleting the article, as some obscure jargon. And all of that is independent of its title. So: needs a lot more context. Eptalon (talk) 07:16, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

A question: Is "subst:uw-vandalism1" better than "uw-vandalism1"?

Hello! Is it the same thing to send a warning with "subst:uw-vandalism1" than "uw-vandalism1"? Julius 12345 (talk) 18:43, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello. The answer is both yes and no, as they display the same message to the user, but they work differently. If you use {{uw-vandalism1}}, the template is transcluded. That means the warning stays linked to the template, and if the template is later changed, the warning on the talk page will change too. If you use {{subst:uw-vandalism1}}, the template is substituted. The full text of the warning is copied into the page when you save it. After that, it's just normal wikitext and won't change if the template is edited. On simplewiki warnings are usually substituted so that the message stays exactly as it was at the time it was given. You can read more about substituted templates here. BZPN (talk) 18:50, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for info. In next time I will use: {{subst:uw-vandalism1}}. I have used until now: {{uw-vandalism1}}. Do I have to change the previous warnings to {{subst:uw-vandalism1}}? Julius 12345 (talk) 19:00, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

Yes, it's best to change the previous ones to use subst: as well, so they won't keep transcluding the template, and won't unnecessarily increase MediaWiki's load :). BZPN (talk) 19:03, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

Okay, thank you! Have a nice day. Julius 12345 (talk) 19:04, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

Template for overciting?

Hello, do we have a template to signal that there are too many sources in an articel? - the article Gaza genocide has 59 working, and a few non-working sources. Looking at the length of our current article, I would expect 15-20 cited sources at most. Eptalon (talk) 12:29, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Yes. {{Excessive citations}} — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 12:55, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

I put the template on the page, it looks like it is the only page using it at the moment. I also changed the wording of the template, and removed the links to an EnWP essay we don't have. Should we move it to 'too many citations' or similar? Eptalon (talk) 14:19, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Too many would surely be simpler than excessive, so I'd support the move. -Barras talk 14:35, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

I was bold and moved it Eptalon (talk) 15:22, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Steven1991

What should one do with some of his pre-blocked edits? Do we have carte blanche to revert in full or delete some of his edits? For example Holocaust uniqueness debate and Palestinian political violence? Yeatglazer (talk) 03:18, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

I think each article should be judged based on its merits. This is about the subject, independent of who created the article. Note also that RfD is not for cleanup. If you think an article or section needs attention there are tags you can use. The article will then show up in the respective category. If you think an article should be deleted, nominate it for deletion. Eptalon (talk) 08:52, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

I just looked at the article about the 2023 attacks on Israël, where he also contributed. Cut down on references, simplified language. Likely needs to be done for the other articles too. Eptalon (talk) 13:52, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

Ok. Kind of like the person above said he had a tendency to refbomb everything, usually with tangentially related things like here. This user Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Current issues and requests archive 92#c-Polygnotus-20251126151100-Steven1991 was cleaning up some of his edits, but they were extensive Yeatglazer (talk) 23:16, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

I don't see why correct and well-sourced edits should be removed, even if the user is later blocked. If the edit is good and supported by reliable sources, it should not be deleted just because the user was blocked. A block is about the users behavior, not about whether a specific edit is good or relevant. -- SimmeD (talk) 23:40, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

The thing is that he was pushing a pov, like saying the holocaust uniqueness debate is holocaust denial or distortion and calling scholars that question it antisemitic 1 2 constantly saying Wikipedia is antisemitic 3 even saying half the world holds deeply entrenched antisemitic views where on wikipedia the adl is questionable on antisemitism 4, and many edits on Israel-Palestine. He was basically weaponizing antisemitism 5 Here was barras unblock decline reason 6

"Unfortunately, this is not a convincing reason to request an unblock. Having over 20,000 edits and creating more than 200 articles does not, in itself, justify lifting the block. In fact, it means that each of your contributions—including every page and every edit—needs to be carefully reviewed.

At first glance, many of the articles appear to contain original research. Additionally, most of the pages you created are overly complex, not necessarily in terms of language, but due to an excessive use of footnotes."

Simple wikipedia simply doesnt have the resources or time to fastidiously fact check some of his countless questionable edits like on English Wikipedia (which is probably why he refbombs), thats why reverting to pre-him would just be easier. But there should be more input as to what Yeatglazer (talk) 02:49, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

I would like to help by checking the edits :-) This will likely need to be done manually since some edits may be valid. -- SimmeD (talk) 07:41, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Most of his edits on Nazism and Jew history are good but his edits on Israel or in some cases antisemitism seem to be skewed Yeatglazer (talk) 22:58, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

I think this contains more info User:Polygnotus/Steven1991 if u would like to Yeatglazer (talk) 07:37, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

As you say, he has done over 20.000 edits. At that level reverting all of without examining them is unrealistic. It is much better to actually look at the articles, and fix them, like I did with the one above. I cut it down from 50k to 15k in text size. Eptalon (talk) 07:43, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi

I want start editing.. but only content build.. i want to edit some issue vandalism solve types.. may i? 赛义菲 (talk) 18:12, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello! Welcome to simple Wiki. Special:RecentChanges is a good place to look for vandalism. Sometimes vandalism can also be found in Special:NewPages. You can also use that page to find new articles to make better. If you want to create new articles, make sure to read WP:N to see if the topic is okay to have here. Let me know if you have any questions! Garsh (talk) 05:43, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Thank noted ✅️ 赛义菲 (talk) 07:17, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Help

I am a new editor in Simple English Wikipedia. I want to submit my draft to add it to the main space. What should I do here.

Draft:Wonsan TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 14:30, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi @TheGreatEditor024, we do not have a draft space like the English Wikipedia. If it is ready, you can move your article to the main space and it will be live immediately. Ternera (talk) 14:37, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

How, I am new to Simple Wikipedia. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 14:48, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

Can any AFC reviewer check my draft TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 14:51, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

I mean the article I wrote TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 14:51, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

I Published it. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 16:57, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello @TheGreatEditor024. We do not have AFC on simple Wiki and there's no process for reviewing articles before they are public. I did take a look at Wonsan and it is a good first article. Next time you make an article, try to use more simple English. WP:HOW is a good place to look for more information about how to make simple articles. Also, if you need to move an article to main space, you can use the "Move" link under Tools on the right side of the page.

Thanks for making Simplewiki better! Garsh (talk) 03:50, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

Well, I am a wikipedian in English Wikipedia and tbh I am not an expert in Simple English but Im realy to learn. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 08:50, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

How to avoid triggered filters

My recent edits triggered the edit filter multiple times, even though they were constructive...Could an admin please clarify which filter is being triggered and how I can avoid it in the future? 赛义菲 (talk) 07:09, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

I am not an admin, but the abuse filters logs are public. See Special:AbuseLog where you can search with your username. It seems you are often triggering filters when removing parts of an article or adding content that is very similar to enwiki. Please remember that articles here must be in simple English. See WP:HOW for more information. Garsh (talk) 03:25, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

Antonio Segni

I first asked in the "Talk" section, but I think it's better to ask here after all. In the article history of Antonio Segni, an IP address added a large amount of text about a year ago. I was just about to revert since the language isn't simple for simple Wikipedia, and too much information with little to no references. I think it would be better to cut most of it down. Do you guys agree with this approach? Thanks in advance. Patandor (talk) 01:01, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

Looking at the version of 3. November 2023, the version is much smaller (in the order of a few sentences, plus a few references). I get a Flesch-Kincade score of 55.4, which trtanslates to '10th to 12th grade / fairly difficult to read'. If I do the same with our current version (that is, with the addition, I have a lot more text, but readability scores drop to 29.8, 'College graduate / Very difficult to read'. The IP Address that made that edit only has one edit here. Besides being difficult, the added ext also needs to be wikified. Eptalon (talk) 06:41, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

I have reverted to the vertsion I mentioned above, plus added 2-3 snippets. Anyone is free to edit / add text, but if people do, they should also take the effort to simpplify this text. Eptalon (talk) 06:56, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

I'm glad we got this sorted! Out of curiosity, where do you find/use the Flesch-Kincade score? Is that something that everybody should use when writing an article? Patandor (talk) 12:11, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

PLease don't overrate it, see en:Flesch–Kincaid readability tests for background info. The basic idea is the following: Shorter sentences are easier to understand, and shorter words are simpler. Put in a magic cauldron, stir well, and you'll get a number that indicates the readability or the grade level. It is a commonly accepted measure, and there are many online tools that allows to calculate these numbers. Let me add a word of caution though: The validity is not absolut. In general, so called phrasal werbs ('put up') are more difficult to understand for more people than the corresponding non-composite word: Example - 'They put out the fire' vs. 'They put out the trash'? - one word difference, completely different meaning. Also think about writing an article on a scientific subject. TO be accurate you'll need ot use certain vocabulary that has a well-defined meaning in your odmain of study. You can likeyl simplify the sentences, but you'll still need your vocabulary to be accurate. When you come from EnWp, getting into the habit of writring 'Simple English' will take osme time. And no, it can be quite difficult, even if the sentences look simple. Eptalon (talk) 12:27, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

Ahh, okay! Sounds good. Let’s leave it as it is and move on. Thank you for the explanation! Patandor (talk) 12:35, 22 February 2026 (UTC)