Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/nms642
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.
Final (1/6/0); ended 16:26, 9 October 2015 (UTC) per WP:NOTNOW Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:26, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nomination
[edit]nms642 (talk · contribs) this user is smart, nice, and funny nms642 (talk) 15:06, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Questions for the candidate
[edit]Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:
- 1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
- A: i would help new users and help people for plagiarism
- 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
- A: I am a good leader as troop guide in my troop i help the yonger scouts.
- 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- A: no i havn't but i would talk to them and try to figure it out
Discussion
[edit]- Links for nms642: Nms642 (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
- Edit summary usage for nms642 can be found here.
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review their contributions before commenting.
RfA/RfB toolbox | |
|---|---|
| Counters | |
| Analysis | |
| Cross-wiki | |
Support
[edit]- moral support This can't pass, but I commend you for your initiative, and willingness to help with the project. Stick around, gain experience, and re-apply after a year and several thousand quality edits. As a side note, on your next RfA, please better demonstrate how you meet Wikipedia:Guide to requests for adminship#What RfA contributors look for and hope to see. Happy editing! 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 16:09, 9 October 2015 (UTC) Amended[reply]
Oppose
[edit]- WP:TOOSOON only 3 days old. Hasteur (talk) 15:47, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Not yet.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 15:50, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply] - Oppose. Am only interested in goodlooking admins; that quality not listed. Fun is overrated. Drmies (talk) 16:16, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Can't read English or at least is totally unable to understand simple instructions. Not good qualities fo admins. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 16:16, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Kudpung, they have nine edits in article space; that's more than some crats have. Drmies (talk) 16:17, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose I applaud your ambition but I wonder whether you wanted this RfA to go live quite yet. Liz Read! Talk! 16:23, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose WP:NOTNOW While I welcome the user's desire to contribute to Wikipedia.I feel it is too early with just 3 days of editing.Maybe in future .Sorry.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:23, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral
[edit]
General comments
[edit]- I discovered this user's RFA nomination while trawling through their edit history because they added themselves to the DRN volunteer roster. Purely procedural action in transcluding the nomination and getting the clock running. Hasteur (talk) 16:14, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.