Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Bashkir Ha
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: keep. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 21:03, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
The draft has experienced very little to no improvement in recent edits, and there seems to be an effort to avoid speedy deletion for abandonment.
I also strongly doubt this topic is notable per GNG. Janhrach (talk) 19:14, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Effort to avoid appearance of abandonment is proof that it is not abandoned. GNG is irrelevant to draftspace. SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:39, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Keep - See Drafts are not reviewed for notability or sanity. User:Janhrach - Please stop ragpicking for drafts. If they really are abandoned, a bot will nominate them for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:12, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: not a criterion for deletion. G13 is available only for long inactivity, and that is for a reason. TheTechie@enwiki (she/they | talk) 22:08, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- This draft was just submitted for AFC review on Dec. 22nd so obviously an editor(s) are still working on it. It's not happening here but it's not misconduct to do minor edits to a draft avoid CSD G13 deletion, I've come across drafts that were created in 2019 that are still regularly edited. We allow a lot of leeway to editors working in Draft space and, as SmokeyJoe states, we don't judge drafts at MFD for GNG notability. Liz Read! Talk! 03:09, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.