Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2019 February 5
February 5
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:50, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
- File:Josef Grohé.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Brigade Piron (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Non free image, an alternative Public domain image is now available at commons at the same location. c:File:Josef Grohé.jpg DBigXrayᗙ 15:41, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
- I uploaded the file and I don't object. However, I do not understand the basis for the claim that c:File:Josef Grohé.jpg is free. It seems to have the wrong tag at very least. —Brigade Piron (talk) 15:55, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
- If you're disputing the licensing at the Commons, you would need to take it up there. For what its worth, I don't see anything immediately wrong with the file there. — fourthords | =Λ= | 17:10, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete ¶ Given the existence of the file on Commons, this one fails the first non-free content criterion. — fourthords | =Λ= | 17:10, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:51, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
- File:EXT The Resonance track.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Kovaelin (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Non-free music cover image is being used as means of identification in the soundtrack section of a video game article. There is no significant sourced commentary about the image. Fails WP:NFCC#8. Whpq (talk) 20:07, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:51, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
- File:Stanley Kubrick circa 1999 approximately 70 years old.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Bryan Cain (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
We already have four free images of Kubrick in the article, so having a non-free adds nothing. The image is of Kubrick as an old man, serves no encyclopaedic purpose (so fails WP:NFCC#8). SchroCat (talk) 20:08, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - a clear failure to meet WP:NFCC#1 -- Whpq (talk) 20:13, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. The non-free image fails to meet NFCC criteria, especially given the free images we have. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs(talk) 17:13, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.