Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2019 February 4

< February 3	February 5 >

February 4

File:Ralph Northam yearbook page with Klan robe and blackface.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relicense File:Ralph Northam yearbook page with Klan robe and blackface.png as non-free and delete File:GovernorRalphNorthamMDYearbookpicture.jpg. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:34, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tagged as PD by virtue of being published without a copyright notice. Can we get some evidence that it was published without a notice, please? Either someone finding a full copy of the yearbook online or going to the EVMS library to see it for themselves? (Unless this can be proven to be public domain, I believe we should retag it as fair use. It clearly passes our significance requirement.) --B (talk) 13:06, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea if it is PD or not. That's why I uploaded it as fair use. Maybe User:Illegitimate Barrister knows? Also, I'm a bit unclear on notifying people; was that enough to notify that user? Adoring nanny (talk) 02:31, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Adding File:GovernorRalphNorthamMDYearbookpicture.jpg as it's the same image, just cropped less. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 01:44, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete one and relicense as non-free the other unless verifiable evidence confirms that the files are in the public domain. The photo definitely qualifies under the WP:NFC as an object of sourced commentary. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 01:49, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tama CX V1.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

too low in quality to be of any encyclopedic use Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:12, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 23:53, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Retain, under what legalistic rationale I'm not expert enough to suggest, but clearly this is a politically important image, which readers need to see.Lobsterthermidor (talk) 00:36, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Orphaned and low resolution, possibly with c:COM:TOYS issues as well. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 00:46, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.