Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 September 23

< September 22	September 24 >

September 23

File:Jeff archer as hockey coach.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Speedy delete as vandalism. JamesBWatson (talk) 00:24, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I see no encyclopedic use for this poor photoshopping of a photo from commons. Eeekster (talk) 00:17, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ABBA Teens.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep as PD-textlogo. SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:50, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The logo is used merely for cosmetic purpose in the article, along with another logo just beside it. Fixer23 (talk) 08:38, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment would this qualify as PD-text-logo? -- 76.65.131.248 (talk) 23:58, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:A Teens logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep as pd-text. SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:52, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The logo is used merely for cosmetic purpose in the article, along with another logo just beside it. Fixer23 (talk) 08:39, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment the article is called A-Teens, so one would expect that their business logo would enhance an understanding of their product. Many business articles have their logos prominently displayed in their infoboxes, -- 76.65.131.248 (talk) 23:55, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment would this qualify as PD-text-logo? -- 76.65.131.248 (talk) 23:59, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep {{PD-textlogo}} --Stefan2 (talk) 08:13, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CarolynaMusicVideo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not discussed critically. Stefan2 (talk) 10:34, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I already wrote a description for the music video screenshot. --SuperHotWiki (talk) 11:36, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You got it wrong. The image should support the text, but instead you made the text support the image. It should be the other way around. --Stefan2 (talk) 17:05, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I edited the music video paragraph and it now supports the picture that I uploaded. So could you now please remove this from deletion. --SuperHotWiki (talk) 19:05, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - its now critically discussed.--SuperHotWiki (talk) 10:39, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image is not critically discussed. The text completely ignores the image. The article mentions the music video, but the image tells absolutely nothing about the music video. --Stefan2 (talk) 11:45, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Deadma-veldt 03.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Excessive use of non-free files. See WP:NFCC#3a and File:Deadmau5-the-veldt.jpg. Stefan2 (talk) 10:40, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:After Earth 1000 AE film poster.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image is not from the studio. It was created by an enthusiast graphic designer and posted at http://www.behance.net/gallery/After-Earth-Teaser-Poster/3156122, from which it seems to have been copied to all the bad film sites on the internet. If you look at the user (Aaron Randall)'s gallery, you'll see other unofficial materials for other movies. —Kerfuffler scratch
sniff 11:06, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ThisTimeMusicVideo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8: seemingly random picture of a person. Doesn't help with understanding the subject of the article better in any way. Stefan2 (talk) 17:07, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Its not random if you have seen the music video which 100% related to the article of the single.--SuperHotWiki (talk) 18:20, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote a new paragraph for the music video JUST to keep the picture that I just uploaded today to improve the article. Hopefully you won't have any new reason to delete it.--SuperHotWiki (talk) 18:44, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - improved the quality of the article.--SuperHotWiki (talk) 10:41, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The image still isn't discussed critically. --Stefan2 (talk) 11:46, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sweetim4IE.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image associated with an article deleted six years ago. No encyclopedic use for the image; absentee uploader. No evidence the public domain tag is true anyway. Angr (talk) 20:06, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Softpedia no spyware.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image associated with an article deleted six years ago. No encyclopedic use for the image; absentee uploader. No evidence the public domain tag is true anyway. Angr (talk) 20:06, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.