Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 April 8

< April 7	April 9 >

April 8

File:IISER-Pune logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:01, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File has been replaced by IISER-Pune_logo.png Aaditya 7 05:41, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom; redundant copyrighted logo. Seegoon (talk) 15:27, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Deccan Education Logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:01, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This file has been replaced by 1fclogo.JPG Aaditya 7 06:18, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Glutaconic acid.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:01, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Was tagged for low-resolution, now it's also unused and have usable replacement on commons (high-res diagram of each of the two forms, as File:Glutaconic acid trans vinyl-H.png and File:Glutaconic acid cis vinyl-H.png...would be trivial to make an improved combined one if there were any need for it) DMacks (talk) 06:57, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Logo of Lashkar-e-Taiba.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Source information says - "The logo may be obtained from Lashkar-e-Taiba", i don't get how anyone could obtain this logo from a terrorist group. Is there any website or something? Bill william compton^Talk 16:44, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I've found it is used by those news sources, [1] [2] [3] [4] [5], but most interestingly this international terrorist symbols database ^walk victor falk^talk 10:01, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reply: So, why did you write "it might be obtained from Lashkar-e-Taiba", well whatever reason you had it is hilarious for me. I think you should correct the "Source" info of file's summary and after that i don't think there would be any problem in retaining this file, but in future always take care of such things. Bill william compton^Talk 10:54, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I never uploaded that picture nor ever made any edit to it. You are the one that should be careful, mixing me up with uploader. ^walk victor falk^talk 12:59, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies; i didn't mean to be offensive, obviously it was for uploader. I missed out to see the name.. Bill william compton^Talk 13:35, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Farhad.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G5 by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:14, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

News photograph from an Iranian news source. Was deleted as copyvio and then restored on the argument that Iran is not part of international copyright treaties. However, as stated at Wikipedia:Copyrights#Governing copyright law, we have a long-standing practice of upholding the protection of Iranian copyrights even if current US law doesn't force us to. Moreover, the source attribution for this image is unverifiable, as the source link is dead. Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:24, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - we don't treat these images as PD. --Damiens.rf 20:17, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Free images of well-known athletes who are in active competition at the present time should be obtainable. ^walk victor falk^talk 07:59, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Photo of rss member.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We don't need a non-free image with an unknown source to illustrate what a member of the Red Swastika Society looks like. Damiens.rf 20:15, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt we will ever come up with a free image. If we do, then let's replace this one; but until then I'd rather have an image than no image.Erudy (talk) 07:01, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's not how we run stuff here. --Damiens.rf 15:13, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.