Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 April 7

File:Fuller's earth output2.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: problem fixed. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:58, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The chart is incorrect, showing production in northeast US when production is in southeast US (Georgia and vicinity states). Original uploader is blocked for sockpuppetry. Wonder if it was a form of vandalism vs an error. MartinezMD (talk) 01:16, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Don't delete, {{sofixit}} I moved the green spot to the south. ^walk victor falk^talk 07:15, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, that works. Doesn't need deletion. Didn't realize it wa that easy to fix.MartinezMD (talk) 11:42, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Great, closing this then. Good job fixing the image. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:58, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mannitol.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Poorly-rendered svg, missing stereochemical details critical for knowing that this even is the title compound. Many alternatives, including non-bugged svg, in commons:Category:Mannitol DMacks (talk) 03:05, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Union Monument Louisville M1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:01, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative work of copyrighted sign (work of state government, not federal). Image of sign not necessary for understanding the concept, so fails fair use as well. SchuminWeb (Talk) 03:33, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:36, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: A subsequent nomination for some reason erased this nomination when it was originally made. So this is a relist in the sense that this was originally posted, but never really listed properly. SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:36, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Aangan terha shakeel.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:01, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free movie screenshot used in movie article and (without an additional FUR) in article about actor. Apparently random scene, not embedded in any analytical commentary in either article; only purpose seems to be to underline the mere fact that the actor starred in the movie. Fails NFCC#8 in both cases. Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:02, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep Screenshot of main character of series. When I go to Fawlty Towers, I see pictures of both Basil, Sybil and Manuel. Otoh, I think the picture is of poor quality, and a more representative and/or expressive could be uploaded. ^walk victor falk^talk 07:26, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- It would need substantially more analytical commentary to support such a FUR. Currently the article is a mere stub with a cast list. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:44, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP:TIND Wikipedia articles are built erratically. See also stygmergy. ^walk victor falk^talk 07:50, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Yalta Conference (The Big Three) (B&W).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete as hoax, kudos to Hohum for catching this Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 05:10, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unecyclopedic, faked, compare to the original here: http://content.answcdn.com/main/content/img/getty/6/5/2642765.jpg (Hohum ^@) 21:31, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just to make sure we all know what's being talked about, you're saying the faked element is the guy in the background that was exchanged, right? (standing behind the Churchill, next to the pillar). It may not be immediately apparent to everyone. (Here's another shot from the same scene [1], also showing the same guy as the correct [2].) Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:02, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the man in the background has been replaced. (Hohum ^@) 16:05, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Everybody that is in both pictures has exactly the same posture, frozen. ^walk victor falk^talk 07:47, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I'd speedy it as an obvious hoax right now, except that I'm still curious and hoping somebody might find out who the guy is that was photoshopped in. What's that uniform he's wearing? Would be fun if it turned out it was actually a German or something. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:01, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My first thought of his uniform was "Alfredo Stroessner", the archetype of the gaudy tin-pot dictator. There are many alternatives, like his Argentinian counterpart: file:Videla_Stroessner.jpg. I've notified milhist. ^walk victor falk^talk 07:50, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a fake Jim Sweeney (talk) 17:24, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as the image is faked and doesn't seem to be a notable fake. The guy in the background might be wearing a Red Army-type uniform, so it's possible that this is one of the doctored images which the Soviet Government produced, but unless that can be verified the image is worthless. Nick-D (talk) 00:28, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a fake - while we're on the subject of photoshopped Yalta photos, this one gave me a chuckle. Parsecboy (talk) 03:22, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.