Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zillion Technology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete. Creator blanked the page - it has been speedily deleted per G7. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 08:18, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Zillion Technology

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The assertions made in this article and on its purported website - "Bigshare Services (P) Ltd. which is amongst the top 5 Corporate Registrars & Share Transfer Agents in India. Its Clientele base Exceeds 400 Corporates and includes MNC’s, MF’s and Bluechip Corporates. - are without any substance. This would be a routine WP:A7/ WP:G11 deletion. However there are multiple competing additions to the article that suggest this may possibly be about other corporate entities of this or a similar name. WP:AFD is not for clean-up , but I'm WP:IAR-ing here. I'll edit the AfD rational to expand on my concerns. Shirt58 (talk) 09:53, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 10:17, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 10:17, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 10:17, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Was tagged for G11, but author removed speedy tag. I am willing to delete via AFD as non-notable and highly promotional now that AFD has been tagged. Would qualify for G11. Any A7 credible claim of significance doesn't establish notabilility.Robert McClenon (talk) 10:30, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - There are no sources. CLCStudent (talk) 19:50, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.