Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XSitePro

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jayjg ^(talk) 05:16, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

XSitePro

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article fails to meet Wikipedia:Notability requirements by introducing significant coverage in reliable sources.

Furthermore, this article is written like an advertisement. For instance, see how it lists Mac on its supported operating system, using virtualization as a pretext. Or see the titles of empty sections. "Corporate awards", "Corporate product support", etc. Fleet Command (talk) 16:14, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I would have wait with the AFD until tomorrow, if there is more input... So my vote will be on hold. If there is no independent reference, I will vote with delete! mabdul 16:18, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleate I can't fined any more sources, but there was not, so deleat it.Wipsenade (talk) 10:55, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Maby not yet.86.24.23.224 (talk) 13:12, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleteify, It's corporate a hoax/advertisemet.81.100.118.205 (talk) 14:40, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It's growing, but needs to be wikifyed.82.27.30.173 (talk) 16:19, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Where is it growing? No real content nor any independent reliable source was added until now! mabdul 17:51, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, as per above. mabdul 17:51, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:13, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, It's icoherent, dopy trash.82.18.207.161 (talk) 12:12, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete This article was userfied after a WP:REFUND request. Someone other than requestor appears to have made a copy/paste version that still maintains all of the same reasons for deletion that got it speedied the first time. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 13:13, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Another (User:OSborn) user has tyded it up a bit and I added ===Plugins===.86.16.4.10 (talk) 19:34, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

...and that makes it more notable somehow? (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 00:07, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This page is, like the article, a troll-fest.86.25.53.24 (talk) 10:31, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

- Hyper-keep to anoy the above trolls.82.18.193.188 (talk) 18:23, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - This is not a vote! We are discussion here with arguments! mabdul 10:50, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.