Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wofai Fada

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 15:39, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wofai Fada

[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Wofai Fada (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Possible covert UPE/COI article on an actor and comedian that doesn’t fulfill WP:NACTOR as she hasn’t taken up any lead roles in any movies she has featured in neither has she won or have been nominated for any prestigious award thus falls short of WP:ANYBIO. A review of the sources used in the article show a lack of editorial oversight or sources which don’t even concern subject of the article. Celestina007 (talk) 00:32, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 00:32, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 00:32, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 00:32, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 00:32, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Source assessment table
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
Yes No Self published blog with No editorial oversight No Basically announces her birthday. ✘ No
Yes No No editorial oversight present No The article focuses on an organization rather than the subject of the article ✘ No
No it is a short comedy skit of which she appears to have created herself No it’s a comedy video not independent of her No It literally is a mere comedy skit & doesn’t discuss her in any way ✘ No
No It is an interview thus isn’t independent of her No No editorial oversight and it’s an interview hence can’t be considered reliable Yes ✘ No
No The piece is regurgitating an interview of a different source entirely No it is regurgitating an interview from a different source entirely thus cannot be considered reliable. Yes ✘ No
Yes Yes No It’s a list of individuals who are nominated for a non notable award & definitely isn’t significant coverage ✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to get better consensus. Expertwikiguy (talk) 10:55, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Expertwikiguy (talk) 10:55, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Wofai_Fada&oldid=1005205103"