Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Winged Waltz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:57, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Winged Waltz

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails WP:NALBUM. I don't know that Metal Storm is a reliable source, let alone notable itself. Chris Troutman (talk) 20:32, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Sweden. Chris Troutman (talk) 20:33, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:07, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For what it's worth, Metal Storm is listed on WP:RSMUSIC with a discussion from 2011, and this review is marked as staff. However, the article doesn't have much going for it beyond that and I couldn't find anything additional, so I think redirecting to October Tide would be more appropriate. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 23:28, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Keep page with two reliable sources. If it cannot be kept, it should be merged into October Tide. --Jax 0677 (talk) 11:34, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I see this and this, which covers the significance of the subject and also a review, all from reliable sources, of which I believe it's enough to keep the article afloat. And yes, "Metal Storm" is a reliable source until proven otherwise, nominator should see WP:RSMUSIC. dxneo (talk) 07:37, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:17, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: 2 reliable sources is enough to establish notability. Nagol0929 (talk) 22:44, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - reliable and good sources. WP:GNG.BabbaQ (talk) 22:09, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.