Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WineGUI

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Wine (software)#Third-party applications. Vanamonde93 (talk) 01:45, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WineGUI

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD removed with insufficient reasoning, just "Stop deleting this wiki page". No notability whatsoever. TheTechie@enwiki (she/they | talk) 00:34, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: All you can find are download links and blog posts, nothing we'd use for reviews or any critical discussion. What's in the article for sourcing isn't helpful. Oaktree b (talk) 01:08, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 01:12, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No notability GUI, also, the article haves only primary source. Vitorperrut555 (talk) 01:29, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Wine_(software)#Third-party_applications, where it is mentioned. मल्ल (talk) 22:35, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/wikis/WineGUI is NOT a primary resource. Danger89 (talk) 12:57, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per मल्ल. Seems like an easy enough target. Conyo14 (talk) 00:57, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Here is another source: https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/wikis/WineGUI Danger89 (talk) 12:15, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
And this is not a primary source, winehq.org is not my server. Danger89 (talk) 12:16, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry this isn't personal, but you shouldn't really be creating articles about your own projects. See: WP:Conflict of interest. You aren't being censored, there just isn't enough independent sourcing right now. मल्ल (talk) 15:08, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I understand. Still I don't agree with this policy. The context is written based on facts. I'm not trying to sell anything, it's free & open source software. And I update the page myself eg. When a new release is out. So the page stays up to date.

The amount of effort in creating well written content takes also time, I don't get paid for anything. Danger89 (talk) 18:13, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I mean, any source that's a download link or the source code would be a WP:PRIMARY source and does not count towards WP:GNG. You would need to find independent reviews or books, to help your case. Conyo14 (talk) 18:27, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Well https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/wikis/WineGUI is not the source :). https://www.winehq.org/ is using gitlab wiki as their new wiki platform. So despite WineHQ is using GitLab, this is their wiki platform, and not a primary source. Danger89 (talk) 17:01, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That is still a primary... Conyo14 (talk) 17:44, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Wine (software) per above Andre🚐 07:44, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.