Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Which (Grammar)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect as this is clear enough to close (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 02:01, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Which (Grammar)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The word "which" probably doesn't need its own article, as Wikipedia is not a dictionary. The article English relative clauses seems to be sufficient for covering the broader grammatical topic. IagoQnsi (talk) 23:52, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Since the word 'that' has a page, I thought that 'which' should too, as they are often confused and they both have complex usage. --TOUtemp (talk) 00:03, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Although, on the other hand, if English relative clauses is sufficient, then you should probably take a look at deleting the that page as well. I agree with you that Wikipedia is not a dictionary, but you can't have one and not the other, as they are often confused.--TOUtemp (talk) 01:54, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 14:36, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to English relative clauses. I think the only way for this to satisfy WP:WORDISSUBJECT is in its relation to other words such as "that" and "who". As such, there should not be article on the individual words, but one article discussing the whole concept. — Amakuru (talk) 09:15, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to English relative clauses - not enough notability to have a separate article per WP:WORDISSUBJECT and hence WP:NOTADICT —UY Scuti ^Talk 07:47, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.