Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Webgility

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. promotional article , by soock, probable paid editing in violation of the trems of use DGG ( talk ) 04:22, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Webgility

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable and created by blocked sock User:User:Davewhelan Theroadislong (talk) 21:22, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as all of this is simply showing it's a local company with some happenstance coverage, examining this still found nothing confidently convincing. SwisterTwister talk 00:17, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 00:17, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 00:17, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.