Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viva PSICOM

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Viva Entertainment#Viva-Psicom Publishing. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:26, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Viva PSICOM

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Well, it's Filipino, so there might be non-English sources, but I've got nothing. The article is essientially unsourced, with only a press release, and even then the press release doesn't really support any of the content in the body. Only thing I can find as far as sources goes is two cringy advertorial pieces in the Philippine Star. Could possibly redirect to Viva Entertainment, but that's a big lump if sourceless cruft itself, and it doesn't appear that we currently have a reliable source connecting the two. GMG ^talk 09:00, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:01, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:01, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. There is something about making all publishing companies notably simply to have a quick reference for discussion of reliability of sources (who is the publisher?). But this is just my idea, and that aside, this company fails WP:NORG. A publisher, just like any other company, needs to show they are somehow important. Just publishing some stuff doesn't cut it. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:09, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Viva Entertainment#Viva-Psicom Publishing as valid search term and WP:ATD-R. czar 16:26, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.