Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vastav Artificial Intelligence

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 03:37, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vastav Artificial Intelligence

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article lacks significant coverage from independent, reliable secondary sources as required by WP:NOTABILITY.Much of the content is derived from company materials and press releases, contravening WP:PRIMARY SOURCES guidelines.The article reads like promotional material without sufficient neutral analysis, failing to meet WP:NPOV standards. Also a stub with minimal content, it does not meet the quality standards expected for an encyclopedic entry (WP:STUB). Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 03:22, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Flyingphoenixchips (talk)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:56, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:56, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails GNG, mainly due to the fact that nearly all the sources are extremely similar, and dubiously reliable. The final couple of sources are more reliable, but make no mention of Vastav. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 05:17, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Reported at SPI Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Btw Santhosh ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 05:30, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG. ScrabbleTiles (talk) 09:50, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails any form of notablity ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 12:01, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Insufficient coverage by independent, reliable secondary sources to pass WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:21, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails to meet WP:GNG. RangersRus (talk) 19:18, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails to meet WP:NCORP too honestly Bluethricecreamman (talk) 20:39, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.