Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Userful

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:51, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Userful

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable subject. Written like promotional material. All citations are from PR press releases. No in-depth coverage in RS. Sabih omar 07:05, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Canada. AllyD (talk) 07:17, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Supported by nothing but press releases.WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 15:20, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep convert it about its platform, meets WP:NWEB. Reliable coverage: [1], [2], [3]. 2001:1970:5016:3D00:B5:EC38:FAE0:8C5D (talk) 16:56, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Note None of these sources indicate notability per WP:GNG. Subject is not web-based, so no relevance of WP:NWEB (or am I missing something?) Also 2001:1970:5016:3D00:B5:EC38:FAE0:8C5D is a Wikipedia:Single-purpose account created only for adding the 3 links mentioned above and adding the "Keep" comment. Sabih omar 03:24, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete insufficient independent, reliable sources to meet WP:CORP, which is the relevant guideline. Eluchil404 (talk) 02:27, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.