Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Up truncation
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:07, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
- Up truncation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
While the cited reference does indicate that the truncate function may be used to expand the size of a file, no source is given, nor can one be found, to indicate that the term "up truncation" is used to describe this action, nor to indicate that performing this action has any given reason or benefit. As such, the description of the action here appears to be original research. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:03, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:15, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter123 (intone) @ 20:12, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter123 (intone) @ 20:12, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
- Down truncate to zero bytes per nom. No hits whatsoever for this term other than this article. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:05, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Search hits shows that any usage are almost exclusively coincidental: either from a hyphenated adjective or phrasal verb before it (e.g. "look up truncation", "follow-up truncation"), or just from a completely different clause/sentence separated by punctuation. 野狼院ひさし u/t/c 07:28, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete: no evidence of this term being used for the task described. If there is a term that has the same definition as "up truncation", then possibly move the article to that term and assess it for notability. Esquivalience t 01:27, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.