Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Umberto Calvello

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. If the creator would still like the article to be deleted, xe can request deletion under CSD G7 as the most substantive contributor. (non-admin closure) →Σ τ c. 00:12, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Umberto Calvello

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am the creator of this article. As I learned more about the subject, I realized that, by the Aerial victory standards of World War I, Umberto Calvello lacked notability. I am now requesting deletion. Georgejdorner (talk) 19:15, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. --Lambiam 19:45, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Well this is certainly an interesting AfD-- someone nominating their own article! I had some suspicions that he might be notable based on the fact that his infobox says he was awarded two silver and one bronze award for valor (though this was unsourced). I checked around to see if I could find any contrary evidence pointing to the individual's notability as a fighter pilot. Calvello was a Sottotenente di Vascello, which is a position just below Lieutenant, so that doesn't qualify him under WP:SOLDIER #3,4, or 6. This Italian page suggests that some of the aces involved in that war were awarded Silver and Gold medals for military valor, but doesn't indicate who they were awarded to. However, this book about Italian aces seems to confirm that he was awarded two Silver medals for valor by the Italian military, and this seems to fulfill WP:SOLDIER #2. The individual is further given some biographical coverage in this book in addition to the significant coverage in the Italian aces book, which would also support the general notability guideline. I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 20:10, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per the sourcing cited by Jethrobot. Carrite (talk) 00:25, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:40, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:40, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:40, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep One of the Italian aces of World War I. The article can be expanded.User:Lucifero4

Keep Fighter aces are inherently notable; also per I, Jethrobot. --Sp33dyphil ©^hat_ontributions 04:05, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note It was the lack of details for his fifth victory, plus the arbitrary way in which Italian aerial victories were adjudged after World War I, that made me doubt his acedom and thus led to my listing this article for deletion.Georgejdorner (talk) 18:27, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.