Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twin Method
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:10, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Twin Method (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Absolutely no notability for this numetal group from the UK. No chart placements, no enduring impact, fails WP:MUSICBIO, WP:BAND, WP:GNG. Tagged since June 2020 it now needs to go. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 15:50, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and United Kingdom. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 15:50, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete, no coverage found for this musical group, seems to have broken up in 2009. Oaktree b (talk) 20:05, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.