Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Travel Weekly Group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:30, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Travel Weekly Group

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. Existing sources either predate the formation of the group or are briefly quoting of one of the publications produced by the group. I'm not finding robust sources either in the form of ghits (largely populated by databases), gnews (non-independent source), or a newspapers.com search focused on England. Nat Gertler (talk) 03:29, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Transportation, and United Kingdom. AllyD (talk) 06:53, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, in February 2022 I combined the article with Travel Weekly as both of them did not have that many sources. I tried to find sources but could not find much. Sahaib (talk) 06:37, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Agree this doesn't pass WP:NCORP. While there are mentions in newspapers about Travel Weekly, haven't found indepth coverage of the company. Quite rightly The Caterer has its own article, but the company, can't derive notability from that WP:NOTINHERITED. Rupples (talk) 02:49, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.