Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Rodriguez

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Lufthansa heist. There is a consensus that Rodriguez does not merit his own article. As there is an appropriate redirect target, there is no need to delete the article. Mkativerata (talk) 20:18, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tony Rodriguez

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Rodriguez is not notable, he is only known for being a member of the team of the Lufthansa heist. Rodriguez does not pass Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Crime victims and perpetrators. Rodriguez falls into WP:ONEVENT as he is only known for the one event of the Lufthansa heist. Vic49 (talk) 19:24, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — --Vic49 (talk) 19:29, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. -- --Vic49 (talk) 19:29, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep - seems to not fail wp:criminal, has had a "long career" if you could have one as a mobster.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:37, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:14, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:16, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect To Lufthansa Heist. Subject's only notability is their involvement in this crime, which already has an article, so I suggest a redirect. --Ozgod (talk) 01:21, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Common criminal who had an involvement with a big crime, and there is already an article for it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gelobet sei (talk • contribs) 12:05, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.