Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tinyproxy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. -- RoySmith (talk) 20:59, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tinyproxy

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability can't find any suitable sources. \\\Septrillion:- ~~‭~~10^Eleventeen 18:05, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 18:55, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 18:55, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 18:55, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 18:55, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not appear to have any significant mentions besides man pages and how to guides — Alpha3031 (talk | contribs) 14:03, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Nominator is now a CU indeffed editor . Kpgj hpjm 03:10, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 07:48, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 10:21, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Some passing mentions in a book ([1]) and some journal articles ([2] and [3]), but I couldn't find any significant coverage. Enterprisey (talk!) 05:53, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.