Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Joyce

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. -Scottywong | talk _ 17:31, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tim Joyce

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable, fails WP:BIO Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 23:42, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 21:31, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 21:31, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Lacks significant coverage to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 16:08, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B music ian 00:13, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, →B music ian 00:52, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – I've now added several references and fixed or replaced the dead citation links. There is enough now to establish notability. SJ Morg (talk) 06:09, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I've reviewed the additional references, and maintain a stance of deletion. Some local coverage about a local meteorologist isn't sufficient to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 13:26, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.