Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Profs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 14:58, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Profs

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional appearing article for a company that seems to fail GNG. Not notable. Rayman60 (talk) 01:12, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Rayman60 (talk) 01:12, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Rayman60 (talk) 01:12, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Rayman60 (talk) 01:12, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Rayman60 (talk) 01:12, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Rayman60 (talk) 01:12, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:42, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:17, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:DELETIONISNOTCLEANUP. The article passes WP:GNG, and the organization has received notable awards. --BonkHindrance (talk) 19:25, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Promotional article with no WP:RS. Dorama285 00:21, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not seeing anything in the article or elsewhere that is remotely sufficient to pass WP:GNG or WP:NCORP. Edwardx (talk) 23:05, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, run-of-the-mill minor start-up. Renata (talk) 06:24, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment there are multiple independent reliable sources present which talks about this is start-up[1],[2], [3], [4] etc. KartikeyaS343 (talk) 08:42, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.