Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Graduate Network

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel (talk) 01:11, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Graduate Network (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The three references provided do not meet the bar for WP:GNG/WP:NCOMPANY. They are: the company's website, a student newspaper and the last one is not sigcov. A WP:BEFORE search did not reveal any reliable sources. There is a Canadian organisation called "National Black Graduate Network", on which there is coverage, but they are a different company. Looking at the creator's talk page, there seems to be a case of undisclosed COI/promo editing ongoing. Modussiccandi (talk) 18:34, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Modussiccandi (talk) 18:34, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Modussiccandi (talk) 18:34, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Modussiccandi (talk) 18:34, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note to closer for soft deletion: This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing. --Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Logs: 2021-01 ✍️ create
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.